2005-12-02 TKULANA_KEA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MCCALL:Yeah. A few years ago we had a previous application in this area where the, Imean, of course, the issue is Kulana Road or -. FUKE:Kulana Kea Road, yeah. MCCALL:Yeah, the road intersection with down below. I just, can you, since youre involved with that, can you, what is going to be required in the way of road improvements to that intersection? FUKE:My understanding is that based on the RS-15 zoning condition and, you know, the applicant, the owners of that property that youre referring to, Mr. McCall, which is the 14-plus acre property on the Hilo side of Kulana Kea directly across of the subject property, they have an obligation to make some intersectional improvements at the bottom of Kulana Kea and the Mamalahoa Highway, otherwise known as the, I guess, Wainaku Road; and that would bealldonewithintheexistingright-of-way.AndIthink,youknow,thatstillwouldbesubject to Department of Public Works review and approval. But I suspect that what it will amount to is pretty much like shaving off the bank and widening, you know, just that entrance area. I cant really commit, you know, specifically, to what it would be because it still would have to be worked out with the DPW; but there is that condition. MCCALL:Okay. Thank you. ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa? SIRACUSA:Yeah. So I noticed in one of the pictures it seemed like the access off of the road was more than a 90-degree angle, so it went back on itself a little bit before it leveled out. So thats the part youre talking about? FUKE:Thats correct. SIRACUSA:Okay. Cause I noticed that did need a little aproning. FUKE:Yeah. And fortunately -. Well, the map doesnt show it but like if you look on the tax map key it kind of like flares out at the end, so there would appear to be sufficient room within the existing road right-of-way. ALAMEDA:Commissioner Springer? SPRINGER:Mr. Fuke, that height limitation that you were discussing with us, would that be covered under Condition E or do we need some additional language? Theres a sentence in there that says The owners of the property may also impose private covenants restricting the number of dwellings. But would that be covered by that covenant discussion? FUKE:It would yeah. But if you want to really have more specific tie down to that, I mean, you know, I do have proposed language. But essentially, you know, Mr. Olson and Mr. Rohr are here. Theyve had discussions with the owner and theyve given the owners, not the owners, but the adjoining property owner that assurance that theyd keep the height limit down to, not to exceed 35 feet. 6EXHIBIT D