|
that concern, as the staff had indicated. Two, I think there are two conditions.
<br />Specifically, you know, in addition to like, you know, thereÓs like this, ultimately along
<br />the Alii Drive area the County is increasingly looking at more mauka/makai kind of
<br />connections. But like as it relates to this particular property, there is a provision in
<br />Condition H of the proposed zone change which allows for the emergency vehicle egress,
<br />you know, a breakaway gate, you know, to allow for this project as well as others in that
<br />area in the event there is an emergency to get through this property and get into the
<br />highway, the Alii Parkway.
<br />ThereÓs also Condition S which requires that the applicant shall purchase and install an
<br />emergency outdoor warning siren acceptable to the County Civil Defense, and an
<br />Emergency Response Plan will all, you know, shall also be submitted for the Civil
<br />Defense approval. And so, you know, there are ways that the pro
<br />you know, some of the concerns raised by the Civil Defense.
<br />The proposed amendment thatÓs requested, maybe itÓs not really like an amendment but
<br />maybe more clarification -. And so if the staff can clarify it, then, you know,
<br />understandably the amendment would not be requested. But one of the things that we
<br />looked at is, like was Condition D. And this project is not intended to be a gated
<br />community; and I believe that the 45-foot storage and turn-around area was put in largely
<br />on the basis that this would be like a gated community. So if the interpretation of
<br />existing condition D can be read to say that if itÓs going to be gated then this is what you
<br />have to do; and if itÓs going to be gated, then you know, you just comply with standard
<br />Department of Public Works requirements, then there would be no need to amend
<br />Condition D.
<br />On Condition H relating to the parkway and the setting aside of additional right-of-way,
<br />the language right now does not specifically say when the County will determine when
<br />this additional right-of-way is needed. And so what, from the developerÓs standing they
<br />got a little bit concerned. Because say if, you know, your project is already completed
<br />and then, you know, five years from now then the County says lik
<br />figured out like we need additional land, then itÓs going to be hard for them to make these
<br />kind of adjustments. So what weÓre asking here is that realistically to give the
<br />Department of Public Works maybe three months or, what did we say, three months, you
<br />know, like from the time that the zone change is approved to say, okay, do you want it or
<br />donÓt you want it, and if so how many feet; and then we can kind of plan around that.
<br />And, lastly, on Condition V, V as in Victor, I think itÓs normally standard that whenever
<br />there are additional rights-of-way that are conveyed and improvements within the
<br />additional rights-of-way that are conveyed to the County then appropriate credit be given
<br />pursuant to the impact fee formula.
<br />So I really, like these are not really major substantive changes but they deal more with
<br />clarification as well as, yeah, more really clarification.
<br />7
<br />
<br />
|