My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-12-04 TLEHUALANI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-12-04 TLEHUALANI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:07:50 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:07:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALDONES:Mr. Fuke, before I open it up for questions, can you al <br />the letter from the Department of Land and Natural Resources? <br />FUKE:Oh, sure. You noticed that the letter said that, you know, a draft, <br />the preliminary environmental, excuse, preliminary, see, IÓm back on the other <br />application. The draft archaeological inventory survey plan was already prepared; and it <br />was submitted to the State. They provided the review. Some add <br />then sent back to the State, you know, for their review and approval. I believe like the <br />way that your staff had written the condition is, you know, there is adequate protection. <br />Because before any construction or land development related perm <br />grading or grubbing or subdivision review and approval, you have to have like an <br />approved archaeological inventory plan which then leads to the next step, which is to <br />have like an approved burial treatment plan. And only after all of those things are in <br />place, then can you have land disturbance activity occur on the <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Fuke. Commissioners, are there any questions of <br />Mr. Fuke? Commissioner Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:Yes. I have a question. Mr. Fuke, about, itÓs not a question but I <br />want some input on this. It has to do with the traffic study, TIAR. ItÓs on the page 8 of <br />the Background Report. You know, it says the levels of service scale thatÓs used is A, B, <br />C, D, E and F. And on some of the studies I notice that we go up to C and as far as E <br />and, oh, D and E. You know, thatÓs at the higher scale of the LOS scale as established. <br />And yet there are no mitigating, what is it, it says that it will not be significantly impacted <br />by this development, thatÓs the findings, thatÓs the conclusion; and there are no <br />mitigating, what am I trying to say, help me -. <br />GALDONES:Conditions. <br />KUBOTA:Conditions that are set up. <br />FUKE:True. The level of -. <br />KUBOTA:Discuss that with me. <br />FUKE:Okay. Mr. Witcher is over here but IÓll try as best as a, from a lay <br />perspective or like a non-engineering perspective to share what I understand. I donÓt <br />know what the difference between E or F, except that I know that if youÓre in normal <br />grading situation, my wife is a school teacher, an F is like, you know, youÓre failing. <br />KUBOTA:ThatÓs right. <br />FUKE:Yeah. <br />KUBOTA:This one also. <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.