2003-12-04 TCLIFTO120403 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

YUEN:Unfortunately, I donÓt think that we can tie, directly tie the two together. You have two separate parcels of property and they are applying for this mauka area. What I didnÓt want to do -. And we did contain some, put some language in our recommendation to make it clear that the recommendation for this site is based upon the site and partially that the site is along the highway and not along the coast. I am concerned that someday when they, if they come in for the makai section, they would say, ÐLook, we have this at the mauka area so why not give us certain zoning on the makai area.Ñ TheyÓve represented that theyÓre not doing that, that they recognize that itÓs two separate areas that need to be looked at separately. Beyond that, I donÓt know what we can do. FUJIKAWA:I have a question. GALDONES:Commissioner Fujikawa. FUJIKAWA:I have a question with the Planning Director. I believe thereÓs three different parcels in that area, right, three different owners? YUEN:In what area are you talking about? FUJIKAWA:You have that Kohanaiki, Ooma, and thereÓs another one in the center, right? YUEN:Yeah. Well, yeah, thereÓs three, well, if you -. Norman, could you point to Kohanaiki makai? Okay, the Kohanaiki makai portion, which is about 470 acres, th is the group that was here at the last Planning Commission, November 7, the last one we had in Kona; and thatÓs the SMA Permit that we just granted there. ThatÓs owned, itÓs a Rutter Development, partnership of Rutter Development and Kenned mauka of Kohanaiki, along the highway, there are 92 acres thatÓs two-thirds owned by the same partnership and one-third by another independent owner. Okay? Now along the highway in between the Kohanaiki mauka area and Ooma, the 83 a small sliver of property thatÓs owned by the Lee family, I believe. I donÓt know how many acres that is but itÓs pretty small. ItÓs maybe 10 acres or something, all right, that separates these two highway properties. Then we have the 83-acre Ooma mauka property that weÓre dealing with here today, with this SMA Permit, thatÓs owned by this CliftoÓs group. And then makai of that thereÓs 217 acres thatÓs also owned by this same CliftoÓs group, separate parcel. ItÓs in the State Land Use Conservation District and does not have any new development permits. And then proceeding, you know, toward the, the next property toward the airport is NELHA, State. FUJIKAWA:I see. So now my other question is, with all this ownership, has the County come up with a General Plan for these developers? Because why my concern is you have all this, each one of them going to have their own sewa canÓt they have one and consolidate it in one? 12