2003-12-04 TSCDKahakai - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

FUKE:Sure. IÓd like to just generally resummarize some of the things that your staff had indicated. And I think, you know, to help illustrate the situation easier, I think if you refer to the submittal, maybe about like, what, 15-20 pages into the staff report where it reflects, thereÓs an Exhibit C, D and E, it shows like a proposed layout. And if I can call, direct your attention to that, and itÓll be easier for me to kind of proceed. KUBOTA:Excuse me. Where are you? FUKE:ItÓs part of the ApplicantÓs submittal. Do all the Commiss you know, I think it makes it easier, thatÓs the reason why I donÓt mind waiting a few minutes. KUBOTA:Is it C, D and E? FUKE:Yeah, C, D and E. KUBOTA:Got it. FUKE:Got it? THIBADEAU:Okay. Got it. FUKE:Okay. Okay. Thank you very much, begging your indulgence. the staff had pointed out, you know, back in 1991, the same property was zoned RS-7.5 and they came in with a 353-unit project, and that was what the SMA approval was for. The owner, subsequently, in 1999, I believe, acquired the property and on its own elected to downzone the property from RS-7.5 to RS-10. And the rezoning accompanying SMA application were approved, back in, excuse me, the year 2000, when the zone change was approved. With the zone change, what happened was that there was a maximum cap of 120 units that was allowed by the zoning. You know, regardless of the fact that whether they could go more but the zoning ordinance at that time conditioned that the project shall have no more than 120 residential units and no ohana units. The SMA application, which was filed and was approved, called for 98 lots. The reason why I was trying to direct it to you is like on Exhibit C, that was what was filed together with the SMA application for the 98 lots. The engineers at that time did their best to try to come out with what they feel would be the, you know, most appropriate layout; and then they submitted that, you know, on the basis that this is wh realistic for the project. Exhibit D shows what finally was approved by the Planning Department back in the year, well, about a year ago, in the year 2002, and it shows, it shows a layout. And there is some measure of difference, you know, between what was submitted in the SMA application and what was finally approved, which is Exhibit D. 3