My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-12-07 TWOOD
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-12-07 TWOOD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:12:21 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:12:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM: You’ve heard what Mr. Torigoe had to say about where we’re at <br />today, that normally what we’re going to try to do is sort of grant or not grant standing. <br />And there’s a possibility there could be others since notice was not given properly. <br />There’s also a possibility that you could work things out with the petition holder, I mean, <br />the Special Permit holder. Would you address those issues for us and make sure we get <br />on the right track? And start with your name and address, please. <br />HAWNEY: Okay. My name is Roger Hawney. I’m president of Orchidland <br />Community Association. My address is HCR 1, Box 4053, Keaau, Hawaii 96749. My <br />understanding here now as far as the deferral of this, I guess we’d like to go on record <br />with the concerns that you already have a letter addressing our concerns here. <br />GOIN: You should confirm that they got that. <br />HAWNEY: And, yeah, can I get confirmation that you received our request? <br />GRAHAM: Yeah. The basic issue for us now is not substance about the <br />application before us. <br />HAWNEY: Right. <br />GRAHAM: But it’s about whether you want to proceed with this intervention <br />into a contested case proceeding. In the contested case proceeding that’s where the <br />substance of the application will come up. <br />HAWNEY: Okay. <br />GRAHAM: And then so normally what we would do is we would consider <br />your application to intervene here today; and we’d ask the landowner, the permit holder, <br />if they object to you intervening or not, and we deal with that first. <br />HAWNEY: Okay, so, yes, we are requesting to have standing in this. If there <br />is a way that we can get issues resolved with Mr. Wood and his representation that would <br />be fine. But at this point that’s where we stand. We haven’t had contact with Mr. Wood <br />really about this, or not in any detail. And so we’re here today basically to make sure that <br />we do get standing in this. We don’t want to have to come back multiple times to be <br />assured that we have standing. And so I guess what I get from you is that you’re not <br />really wanting to hear the issues here today, you just want to know whether we really <br />want standing in this or not; and I say we do. <br />GRAHAM: Right. It also occurs to me that since Mr. Wood’s representative <br />would like a postponement till the next meeting if we were to vote today, which we plan <br />to do, on granting you standing or not, if we grant you standing, our normal process <br />would be to decide how we move forward. Like we’ll assign the case to a hearing officer <br />perhaps and then have him schedule it and whatever. But if Mr. Wood’s representative is <br />asking for a continuation and if you think there is a possibility of working out issues, in <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.