My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-08 TKailua Kona Village
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-08 TKailua Kona Village
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:15:02 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:14:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LIM:Excuse me Mr. Chairman I misspoke that the SMA permit does require a <br />lateral public access easement 10 feet along the shore so thats what this would be-. It may <br />effect the implementing once we get it in place hopefully. And I guess one comment based upon <br />the discussion so far. The, and its been an issue that I have when I listen to the Planning <br />Commission discuss the shoreline setback variances. The Planning Commission, I guess in <br />terms of the shoreline setback law that was established its in the Directors recommendation the <br />second paragraph. But essentially the shoreline setback law was intended to prevent structures <br />from disturbing the natural shoreline processes and causing erosion of the shoreline. Thats what <br />the shoreline setback variance is all about. The Planning Commission treats it a little bit more <br />broadly I think. It mores a no development open space kind of a regulation. So to the extent that <br />you know thats relevant Id like you to take that into consideration. In this particular case weve <br />got a hardened sea wall thats been certified by the State relatively recently when we did this <br />application. And so those, the policies behind the shoreline setback law have been met and if <br />youre talking about disagreeing the project then its more on a no development in that shoreline <br />setbackarearegardlessofwhathappenswiththeshorelineprocesses.Sothatsmyeditorial <br />comment and I appreciate that, thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you Mr. Lim. Commissioner McCall you had a question? <br />MCCALL:Yeah, or maybe just a comment. I think just to make sure that were all <br />clear, the public area is makai of the sea wall. Is that or? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Lim? <br />YUEN:Well the public ownership is makai of the sea wall. <br />MCCALL:Public, yes. Public ownership. <br />YUEN:But there is public access mauka, on the lawn mauka of the sea wall. <br />MCCALL:Yeah, public ownership. The public has rights to be makai of the sea wall <br />but anything mauka of the sea wall is at the you know forbearance of the, of the landowners and <br />I think that the Kimis just have been very generous in allowing this open area to be used by the <br />public. So, thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Other thoughts before we do a roll call? We got a motion again by <br />Commissioner Springer. Second by Commissioner Watanabe. No further discussion. Staff? <br />DARROW:Thank you Mr. Chairman. Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Yes. <br />DARROW:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Aye. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.