2005-12-08 TLava Kuakini - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

improvements describing when each improvement will be required in development of the project. This condition E amendment would relate to the requested amendment also to condition H where we add in front of that sentence pursuant to the schedule of improvements established in the TIAR approved by the Department of Public Works the applicant will then do these improvements. The reason why I wanted to put in a timing issue on that is that there is a pretty good possibility that we will be doing phase development of the project anywhere between 20 and 40 or 50 units in each phase and its very likely that for the initial phase we wont have to do the full intersection improvements that are mentioned in paragraph number H. So, wed just like the flexibility to build as the need arises pursuant of course to the TIAR that would be approved by the Department of Public Works and would be specialized TIAR that would include lists of improvements and the schedule. You know, probably by, you know X number of units you have to put in this, X number of units you have to put in another portion. So thats the reason for that requested amendment. Okay moving further down into condition number H, thats what I just spoke about where we would like to add that language pursuant to the schedule of improvements establishedintheTIARapprovedbytheDepartmentofPublicWorkstheapplicantshallprovide full improvements you know all the other improvements in that paragraph. Lets see. I, in my submittal on condition J those are all just reference corrections from the Alii Highway to the Kahului to Keauhou Parkway so those can be made as a ministerial matter. Moving to the next one, which would be a substantive one is to condition number K. And, the condition K basically says that for the lot that is located to the mauka and thats on the top part of the drawing there behind Mr. Darrow thats lot 1A. The access points for that, for that project should come through this project and what weve discussed with the Director and Department of Public Works is that towards the, the mauka edge of the property on the map there behind Mr. Darrow. The present project and lot 1A would cooperate in the construction of a roadway that goes northward into the new parkway. The Director in his condition K is proposing that it also, that the traffic from the lot on the mauka also come through this project down to the access onto the Kuakini Highway, which is located on the southern portion of the makai part of the project. This is I think a standard road connectivity issue that you usually see when you see subdivision developments and more- most likely in subdivisions which are dedicating their roadways to the County. This will be a private driveway, private roadway through a condominium project which then raises you know respective of the traffic circulation issue, it raises liability and maintenance concerns. You know, whose going to assist the affordable housing buyers to pay for the traffic from the other project coming through. We believe that the traffic circulation for that lot above this project can come out onto the parkway and then theyll be doing like we did we just construct a driveway down to Kuakini and then go out and exit out onto Kuakini rather than coming through the project itself. So we request that the commission delete the portion that requires it to come through the project to Kuakini. Although we do agree with the proposal to have it go through the project out to the Parkway to the north. YUEN:I disagree and we can discuss this now or later. ALAMEDA:I would like to take up this matter now. Thats okay with my fellow commissioners? SIRACUSA:Yes. EXHIBIT B 15