2005-12-08 TLava Kuakini - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

otherwise determined by-. We can say either DPW or the Planning Director. I think weve typically said DPW so I put it that way. Its, you tell me at that point. EMLER:Yes, Im fine with that, leave it at that. YUEN:Leaving it with DPW or? EMLER:Just leave in the requirement. YUEN:Leaving it required but then who has the authorization to, to waive it? I think we should have some authorization to waive the requirement based on phasing. EMLER:To me thats just exactly what hes asking for. LIM:Yeah,allwereaskingforisifwecanprovetoDPWthattheneedofthe plans of that phase of the project doesnt need, doesnt generate the need for this big intersection that wed be allowed to keep it as is until such time as we trigger it. And, theyll control that, we agree that they control it. YUEN:Okay. Well, Ill work, Ill write this up that way. ALAMEDA:Very good. Mr. Emler continue. EMLER:Okay Im going to go ahead and cover some other changes too at the same time that the applicant didnt call for. So on condition F, going right into condition F. We asked to have this no vehicular security gate amendment made to the original conditions, the one thats underlined here in condition F on the Planning Departments copy. However, the last sentence, a vehicular turnaround shall be provided within the project property on the egress, and Im going to add the word side in there, of any such gate. SIRACUSA:Excuse. ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa? SIRACUSA:How would that read then? EMLER:Okay, it would read, A vehicular turnaround shall be provided within the property-. Excuse me. A vehicular turnaround shall be provided within the project property on the ingress side of any such gate. ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE:I got a question. So thats, that mean that where you have that gate you would, it would, youd have a pocket there right before the gate so that people could turn around? EXHIBIT B 22