My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-12-12 TKONAVISTAS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-12-12 TKONAVISTAS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:19:56 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:19:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
meeting. Within this letter, they mentioned that Condition I of Ordinance 02 131 was that they <br />be able to meet the deadline of submitting, receiving Final Plan Approval by November 27, <br />2007. The applicants actually did meet this deadline; so they did comply with the Condition. <br />They are asking for the deferral based on this letter that they are in the process of, in negotiations <br />for selling a portion, or this particular project. And they want to be able to, if things go well, <br />then they’ll withdraw their application; if it doesn’t go well and they need to revise the Plan <br />Approval or resubmit, that they want to have this opportunity to come back to the Planning <br />Commission to do so. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Mr. Darrow. Generally, when an applicant asks for a time <br />extension, we generally go along with that. But we do have a number of people to testify here <br />today. So we’d like to hear from them. Could you just give us a little quick run-through of the <br />project for the Commissioners, so that testimonies we will receive will kind of ring familiar tone <br />in our ears? <br />DARROW: Sure. If I could also just mention, too, that we have received other letters. <br />th <br />We’ve received letters from Cliff Johns, dated, or received December 4; a letter from Penny <br />th <br />Fediuk and that’s December 4; Gary Preston, this was dated December 4, 2007; Karen Wood <br />and David Fediuk. These are all dated December 4, 2007, and should be with the Planning <br />Commission. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Jeff. <br />DARROW: If I can direct the Planning Commission’s attention to the location map, <br />the area of this application is within the North Kona District. Running in a north-south direction <br />through the middle of the map, we have Queen Kaahumanu Highway; it’s identified with a wide <br />gray line. We also have Kuakini Highway that also runs in a north-south direction. There is a <br />red line that runs through a portion of the middle of the map. This is the Special Management <br />Area line. Everything on the lower portion of the map is within the Special Management Area; <br />everything above the map is located within the, outside of the Special Management Area. <br />The applicants, in this case, this actually has been an application that is, this change of zone <br />occurred in 1984, which changed the properties in this particular area from Unplanned to Single- <br />Family Residential 15,000 square feet, as well as Multiple-Family 5,000 square feet or RM-5. <br />The conditions of the change of zone were very specific in regards to the phasings of the projects <br />in regards to the single-family development and the multiple-family, as well as improvements <br />and when they should occur. Additionally, these properties are affected by a LUC docket order <br />that was approved in 1983, changing this area to Urban from Agriculture. In that particular <br />docket, there are also some stringent drainage improvement requirements that have to be done <br />prior to the construction of the RM portion of this property. Additionally, there was an <br />affordable housing agreement that was executed. Again, we apologize for not having the <br />background; it’s just that at this point, until we hear further from the applicant, it may not be <br />necessary to submit that to the Commission. But in that affordable housing agreement, there also <br />are pretty strict conditions requiring the applicant to construct drainage improvements for this <br />particular area. I’m sure the Planning Director might be more familiar with the specifics of the <br />drainage problems in that particular area; but it appears that through the development of this, that <br />the applicants will have to resolve these drainage problems before construction can commence <br />on the RM zoning. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.