My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-12-12 TKONAVISTAS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-12-12 TKONAVISTAS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:19:56 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:19:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There have been multiple time extension requests from the applicant. I believe this extension is <br />No. 7 for Condition I. So this has been over a long period of time that this particular Condition <br />has been trying to be complied with. With that, are there any questions? <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chair? <br />GRAHAM: Yes, Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chair. To what extent, the development of the property is <br />taking place? And what’s the status of the affordable housing requirements and the work that <br />needs to be done addressing the flooding and drainage situation? <br />DARROW: If I could, Commissioner Domingo, if I could defer that to the applicant’s <br />representative. They have submitted information to us that details this, and it goes into detail <br />regarding your question. So maybe he could be able to give a background on those particular <br />issues. <br />GRAHAM: Good. Thank you, Jeff. I’d also like to remind everybody right now we <br />are supposed to leave for lunch at around noon. I do have four public testifiers I’d like to get in <br />before then. I think they also have to leave and couldn’t come in the afternoon. So let’s try to go <br />quickly, if we can. Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: Okay. Just very quickly. Considering that this is a seventh time a time <br />extension has been requested, there’s nothing that indicates here how the Department is viewing <br />this request, whether they’re looking at it favorably or if they just -. I would like to hear from the <br />Director on that, if you tend favorably towards granting another time extension. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN: Well, at this point, to follow up on what Jeff was saying, they don’t need a <br />time extension because they actually submitted plans and they received Plan Approval. They are <br />in effect hedging their situation in that if – they submitted plans for a project that a certain <br />potential buyer might want to do – and if that sale goes through, they might not want to do that <br />type of project, you know. Plan Approval is pretty specific; it lays out your actual project, where <br />the buildings are, how many units, where the parking spaces are, where your access roads are, <br />and the like. So at this point, if that happens and they decide to pursue with their request, we <br />will make a recommendation in due time before it’s presented to the Planning Commission for <br />action, you know. But at this point, all we are, they are asking for deferral and we are fine with <br />the deferral. <br />SIRACUSA: Okay, that’s what I wanted to know. Thank you. <br />GRAHAM: Yes, fine. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: Yeah. It’s my understanding that by the time February comes around and <br />if this deal does go through and the plan does change, then technically, you don’t have Final Plan <br />rd <br />Approval prior to the deadline of November 23. Is that correct? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.