2010-12-15 TFOULKexhibitD - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

as it was. And bearing that in mind, my motion to grant in part and to deny in part the request for continuance. This matter was scheduled for two days, as you all know, of evidentiaryhearing, and this Commission would like to begin taking what evidence it can today, if possible, and of course tomorrow, and to further the hearing to a date to be determined to accept additional evidence. HOUSEL: Do we have a second for that motion? NELSON: Second. HOUSEL: Seconded by Commissioner Nelson. YEH: Mr. Chairman, before the Commission votes – and my apologies for interrupting – in discussions that I’ve had with the client, you know, we are okay with continuing the evidentiary portion on the contested case; so I’m not sure that that motion, in light of that, is actually necessary as opposed -. So we are okay with continuing the contested case portion, evidentiarycomponents of this hearing, is what I maybe perhaps didn’t make clear before. HOUSEL: So you would prefer not to have the evidentiary tomorrow? YEH: Yes. HOUSEL: Okay. P. OLSON: If I could clarify. Essentially,I believe that we would stipulate, or there is a stipulation by Dr. Foulk to continue this matter and we are moving for continuance, and that would be the stipulation. I don’t know what the Planning Department, whether they are going to stipulate as well. SELF: Just stipulate to continue? P. OLSON: Yes. SELF: We don’t have a problem with that. P. OLSON: And Mr. Ali as well. GHALAMFARSA: Yeah, no problem with that. HOUSEL: Okay, so -. YEH: I think it would be good, though, to try to get some possible dates lined up just in advance. GIFFIN: We were -. HOUSEL: So -. GIFFIN: I’m sorry. We were concerned about that, too, Mr. Yeh, because our vision is not to have this being carried on forever, and we do feel that we’d like to have an ending in mind for sure. And with that in mind, I think some sort of schedule, if you will, needs to be worked out, and that’s why 32 EXHIBIT D