2010-12-15 TFOULKexhibitD - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

we were talking about, you know, this kind of thing so that we’re clear. But there is a motion on the floor. HOUSEL: Do we want to have a discussion? Any discussion on the motion? Do you want to withdraw your motion then? GIFFIN: Bearing that in mind, then I would like to withdraw my motion. HOUSEL: Are you okay with that? NELSON: Yeah, sure. HOUSEL: So the motion is withdrawn. So do we have a stipulation of a continuance, agreement upon, with everyone, all parties? PARTIES: Yes. HOUSEL: Okay, good. Can we establish a date that we will further continuance? thth ARAI: The next Leeward hearing is on January 13 and the following month is February 17. th Both of those dates are Thursday. Then the following that, March 17, which is also a Thursday. A lot of these dates were picked simply because it’s also up against a County furlough Friday, so keep that in mind. And I’m also anticipating it’s not going to be a one-day affair, as you understand, so -. HOUSEL: The Director, Planning Director. LEITHEAD TODD: Mr. Arai, if it’s not a problem for staff, you know, we can authorize overtime for the furlough days and schedule a hearing. YEH: So we could have a two-day period, have this public testimony issue, you know, as the Commission had decided before to do it after the contested case hearing except for tomorrow, that might work. GIFFIN: So, Mr. Chairman, are we looking at February then for two days? ARAI: Well, my understanding, too, is to provide enough time not only for publication but to get the information that you desire; so I honestly don’t know how much more time is necessary to get comments regarding the CIA and AIS, for example. LEITHEAD TODD: Yeah, is February enough time? ARAI: And maybe Mr. Yeh has some inkling on when he can anticipate comments from the State DLNR, and that might help us in -. thth YEH: I think if we did -. Was that February 17 and 18? th ARAI: February 17, yeah. 33 EXHIBIT D