Laserfiche WebLink
Ecology and Society 28(2): 32 <br />htt.psf.l� sy/ r[32/ <br />impacts of feral pigs across habitats and over time, as well as <br />articulate Indigenous relationships with feral pigs (Robinson and <br />Wallington 2012). In Sweden, innovative co -management <br />programs for moose helped transition hunters and landowners to <br />a role of ecosystem stewards, which increased hunter <br />participation in management efforts (Lindgvist et al. 2014). <br />Despite these successful outcomes, both studies documented <br />challenges with establishing co -management arrangements, such <br />as gaining government support for local -level management <br />initiatives, ensuring Indigenous knowledge is integrated equitably <br />into co -management arrangements, and maintaining adequate <br />funding to support local monitoring efforts. To improve <br />management outcomes for culturally valued invasive species, <br />hunters and managers must understand the challenges of past co - <br />management arrangements, particularly when culturally <br />important invasive species are perceived differently by various <br />community members. <br />Feral pigs (Sus scrofa) are a common game species. Originally <br />native to Eurasia, feral pigs inhabit many islands throughout <br />Oceania, as well as every major continent except Antarctica <br />(Barrios Garcia and Ballari 2012). Many government agencies <br />around the world classify feral pigs as invasive species that pose <br />major threats to the natural and agricultural environment, <br />economy, and human health (Barrios -Garcia and Ballari 2012, <br />Wehr et al. 2018, Risch et al. 2020, 2021). Feral pigs cause <br />extensive environmental damage to island ecosystems because of <br />trampling and uprooting of native plants, spreading invasive plant <br />propagules through consumption, foraging on native birds and <br />eggs, and altering soil fertility and nutrient cycling through <br />rooting behavior (Diong 1982, Stone 1985, Browning et al. 2008). <br />To enable many other species and ecosystem services valued by <br />Indigenous people to persist, reducing the abundance of feral pig <br />populations in sensitive ecosystems is extremely important. <br />Indigenous Pacific Islanders traditionally placed substantial <br />cultural value on pigs as food, as well as symbols of social, <br />economic, and political power, while managing them in a way that <br />minimized impacts to native ecosystems (Dening 1980, Schieffelin <br />and Crittenden 1991, Kirch 2014, Luat-Hu`eu et al. 2021). Pigs <br />have been a longstanding component of Hawai`i's social - <br />ecological systems (Winter et al. 2018), following the arrival of <br />Polynesians between 1000 and 1200 AD (Pearson et al. 1971, <br />Kirch 2011), and were primarily domesticated and managed <br />through husbandry practices, where Hawaiian families tended <br />pigs in enclosures near their homesteads (Luat-Hu`eu et al. 2021). <br />Pig hunting was not practiced in Hawaii until the 1850s, driven <br />by the introduction of novel tools and land use practices, change <br />in governance and land tenure, and changes in resource <br />abundance (Luat-Hu`eu et al. 2021). Foreigners brought with <br />them different breeds of pigs that interbred with Hawaiian pigs, <br />increasing their size and reproductive output. Further, as the <br />Hawaiian land tenure system diminished following the diversion <br />of water for plantation agriculture, loss of 90% of Hawaiian <br />people from introduced diseases, and changes in land <br />management practices, pigs became feral across the landscape. <br />Today, most pig populations in Hawaii are identified as feral, <br />meaning that they originated from domestic stock, but have <br />reverted from domesticity to become free-living, no longer <br />depending on husbandry for sustenance or breeding (Pullar 1950, <br />Kruska and Rohrs 1974). As a result, today feral pigs threaten <br />Hawai`i's ecosystems, yet are also highly valued as a culturally <br />important food source among Hawaiians and local communities <br />(Lohr et al. 2014). <br />The State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources <br />(DLNR) is the main agency managing feral pigs on land owned <br />by the state. The Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) <br />under DLNR is mandated to manage feral pigs as both a game <br />species for public hunting and as an invasive species that threatens <br />ecosystems and biodiversity. All nonnative bird and mammal <br />game species in the Hawaiian Islands were intentionally <br />introduced for food and hunting purposes (Duffy and Lepczyk <br />2021). Game hunters wishing to hunt on state-owned lands and <br />private lands (with permission) in Hawaii are required to obtain <br />a hunting license from DLNR, which is achieved by passing a <br />hunter safety education course. Hunting on private lands without <br />permission and/or a hunting license is designated as hunting and <br />is subject to legal prosecution by the landowner. The Division of <br />Conservation and Resource Enforcement (DOCARE) is the <br />subsidiary agency mandated to enforce game hunting regulations <br />set by the state. <br />DLNR is legally mandated to protect and conserve natural and <br />cultural resources in the Hawaiian Islands while simultaneously <br />providing public hunting opportunities to local residents and U. <br />S citizens for recreation (Ikagawa 2013). However, natural <br />resource management planning regarding feral pigs has often <br />failed to fully integrate the social -cultural values and practices of <br />Hawaiians and local communities associated with feral pigs, <br />leading to conflicts between pig hunters and agency resource <br />managers (Adler 1995, Lohr et al. 2014). For example, in the 1990s <br />when resource managers installed pig exclusion fences in a natural <br />area reserve with minimal community input, hunters cut the <br />fences to allow feral pigs into the reserve area (Burdick 2006, <br />Warner and Kinslow 2013). <br />The majority of research relating to feral pigs in the Hawaiian <br />Islands has focused on the ecological component, with little <br />attention to the social and cultural values associated with feral <br />pigs and other game mammals. Qualitative research methods such <br />as interviews are extremely valuable for exploring the views, <br />beliefs, and motivations of individuals on a specific matter, in this <br />case the hunting of feral pigs (Gill et al. 2008). However, few <br />studies have used oral interviews to directly solicit local pig hunter <br />perspectives. By conducting interviews with local pig hunters we <br />aimed to answer two main research questions: (1) what are social - <br />cultural values and practices of local pig hunters on Oahu and <br />Maui; and (2) how can knowing hunter values and practices aid <br />to improve policies and collaboration for feral pig management? <br />Understanding the values and practices of local pig hunters may <br />reduce conflicts and help establish effective co -management <br />practices that respect diverse values of community members. <br />METHODS <br />Study site <br />Interviews took place with hunters who resided on the islands of <br />Oahu and Maui. Game mammals on the island of Oahu include <br />feral pigs and feral goats, while the island of Maui has feral pigs, <br />feral goats, and Axis deer (Axis axis). DOFAW provides public <br />hunting opportunities through "public hunting areas" <br />characterized as (1) game management areas; (2) forest reserves <br />