Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative <br /> AT&T's Application—HIL03306 Volcano Village East <br /> Page 16 of 17 <br /> 2006 WL 1699580, *10-11 (N.D. Cal. 2006). <br /> • Least Intrusive Means. The least intrusive means standard "requires that <br /> the provider 'show that the manner in which it proposes to fill the significant gap <br /> in service is the least intrusive on the values that the denial sought to serve."' 572 <br /> F.3d at 995, quoting MetroPCS, Inc. v. City of San Francisco, 400 F.3d 715, 734 (9tn <br /> Cir. 2005). These values are reflected by the local code's preferences and siting <br /> requirements. <br /> 7.3.1. Environmental and health effects prohibited from consideration. <br /> Also, under the Telecom Act, a jurisdiction is prohibited from considering the <br /> environmental effects of RF emissions (including health effects)of the proposed site if the <br /> site will operate in compliance with federal regulations. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv). AT&T <br /> has included with this application a statement from its radio frequency engineers <br /> demonstrating that the proposed facility will operate in accordance with the Federal <br /> Communications Commission's RF emissions regulations. See Attachment 4—AT&T MPE <br /> Report. Accordingly, this issue is preempted under federal law and any testimony or <br /> documents introduced relating to the environmental or health effects of the proposed <br /> Facility should be disregarded in this proceeding. <br /> 7.3.2. No discrimination amongst providers. <br /> Local jurisdiction also may not discriminate amongst providers of functionally equivalent <br /> services. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(13)(i)(1). A jurisdiction must be able to provide plausible <br /> reasons for disparate treatment of different providers' applications for similarly situated <br /> facilities. <br /> 7.4. Timeline for Review <br /> The following state and federal timelines for review apply to AT&T's Application for the proposed <br /> Facility, none of which are exclusive. <br /> 7.4.1. State timeline for review. <br /> AT&T's Application is also subject to the state timeline for review of broadband-related <br /> permits under Section 46-89 HRS. <br /> Section 46-89(a) HRS states: <br /> (a) A county shall approve, approve with modification, or disapprove all <br /> applications for broadband-related permits within sixty days of submission <br /> of a complete permit application and full payment of any applicable fee. <br /> If, on the sixty-first day, an application is not approved, approved with <br /> modification, or disapproved by the county, the application shall be <br /> deemed approved by the county." <br />