My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-02-22 PL-REZ-2023-000053 Sidney Fuke Meeting with Neighbors and Proposed Additional Conditions
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-03-07 Windward
>
#1 Manono Corner, LLC (PL-REZ-2023-000053)
>
2024-02-22 PL-REZ-2023-000053 Sidney Fuke Meeting with Neighbors and Proposed Additional Conditions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2024 8:37:22 PM
Creation date
3/4/2024 8:37:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SidneyFuke, Planning Consultant — <br /> P.O.Box 1345 •Hilo,Hawai'i 96720 •Planning-Variance•Zoning <br /> Cell:(808)989-0640 •Subdivision•Land Use Permits <br /> E-mail:sidneyfuke@gmail.com •Environmental Reports <br /> February 22, 2024 <br /> Mr. Zendo Kern, Director <br /> Planning Department <br /> COUNTY OF HAWAII <br /> 101 Pauahi Street <br /> Hilo, HI 96720 <br /> Dear Mr. Kern: <br /> Subject: Proposed Additional Conditions <br /> Rezoning Application—Manono Center, LLC <br /> TMK: 2-2-036: 076 (PL-REZ-2023-000053) <br /> At the February 1, 2024, meeting of the Windward Planning Commission,two (2) of <br /> the surrounding property owners raised some concerns regarding the subject application. <br /> The applicant then requested the hearing be continued to enable them to meet with them and <br /> hopefully address their concerns. <br /> On February 9, the applicant(Mr. Robert Hamilton and his daughter, Kalysa) and I <br /> met with Mr. and Mrs. Rhoades and Mr. Osako and his wife. Some of the concerns were <br /> more of a global nature and hence beyond the control of the applicant. At the same time, <br /> there were localized issues that could be addressed. <br /> As such and shortly after that meeting, we prepared and on February 12 provided <br /> them a list of suggested conditions for their review and comment. While we had not heard <br /> back from the Osakos, Mrs. Rhoades informed us via email on February 16 that the <br /> proposals did not"meet their needs"and would be sending us a letter to that effect. To date, <br /> we have not received the letter. <br /> As we had requested this deferral, we would like to use this means to report and <br /> share with you and the Commission the gist of the concerns and the applicant's proposed <br /> conditions, conditions which the applicant is prepared to accept. Please note that upon <br /> receipt of any correspondence from the Rhoades, we will be sure to transmit it to your office <br /> and will suggest, if appropriate, further amendments to the contents herein. <br /> PARKING: One of the concerns was that while the applicant is proposing to <br /> construct a building for commercial office/retail use that meets the minimum required <br /> parking, there are certain uses - like a restaurant or a bar -that could generate a need for <br /> more parking. Should that happen, since on-street parking is unavailable in this area, people <br /> may then illegally park on neighboring properties. <br /> To address this concern,the applicant proposed that in conjunction with the Plan <br /> Approval process, the Planning Director carefully review each use and require more parking <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.