My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-03-09 Fire Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Fire Department
>
Fire Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010 - 2013
>
2011
>
2011-03-09 Fire Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2011 10:39:01 AM
Creation date
6/15/2011 10:38:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
communication between the two members regarding the subject and the <br />commission can agendize to have each committee formulate a report tobe given <br />at a scheduled meeting. <br />Deputy Corporation Counsel Brilhante asked if anyone had a particular desire to <br />serve on any specific committee at this point. <br />Commissioner Henkel replied that he would best fit on the Public Relations <br />Committee. <br />Commissioner Namahoe replied that based on her skills, she would be strongest <br />in the area of Office Management and Staffing. She would like to take a proactive <br />yet cautious approach because there are many things the commission is unable to <br />door are beyond its jurisdiction. <br />Commissioner Bowles suggested that the commission look at the original work <br />that was done decide what would be the most valuable. <br />Deputy Corporation Counsel Brilhante stated that would be a very good point. <br />Go back to the original justification for the creation of each committee and if the <br />commission determines the current committees need to be revised, that would <br />entail a revision to the Fire Commission’s Rules and Regulations, which is doable <br />and more formalized. <br />Chair Taniguchi stated that since there was a lot of thought and effort put into the <br />development of the Rules and Regulations, he prefers to move forward with the <br />four standing committees and start making progress instead of going back and <br />revisiting the current Rules and Regulations. <br />Commission Moku asked what the perspective of these committees was when <br />the commission started ten years ago. Now, in 2011, it’s a good time to either: <br />1) look at the credibility or relevance of these standing committees;2) what’s <br />before the commission in 2011; and 3) should the commission revisit what the <br />committees should be. <br />Chair Taniguchi stated he is a bit concerned in a sense that he doesn’t necessarily <br />think the commission should be deeply involved in operations.He does believe in <br />getting in there,work collectively and collaboratively in making improvements but <br />a little adverse to go back and look at things which would necessitate a change in <br />a greater scope relative to the commission’s Rules and Regulations.He believes <br />the standing committees were well thought out and alot of merit involved, good <br />can come out if the commission can activate these committees. <br />Deputy Corporation Counsel Brilhante recommended the committee members <br />make the determination as to whether or not their capacity is best served inthe <br />committee currently identified or if there should be another course of action. <br />That can be part of the initial report from each committee at the next meeting. <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.