My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-04-01 PL-SPP-2024-000062 Mamolani King Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-04-04 Windward
>
#2 Tirtha Luitel (PL-SPP-2024-000062) - Deferred per Applicant Request on 03-21-2024
>
2024-04-01 PL-SPP-2024-000062 Mamolani King Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
4/1/2024 4:37:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
4/1/2024
Description
Opposition testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
"the community" is a large population of struggling local residents who bring their <br /> children to "Animal Falls Road" to see farm animals and for a no-cost hike to a <br /> spectacular, and to us, a sacred waterfall of overpowering mana. Locals park on the <br /> street because they cannot or will not pay for parking. I was told by a parking <br /> attendant in the state lot in December that residents had to pay $5 to park and <br /> tourists $10, despite the DLNR webste which says that resident parking at Akaka <br /> Falls is free. Therefore, my grandsons and I parked along the roadside. Hawaii <br /> residents (a.k.a. locals) will continue to park on the road despite an additional paid <br /> parking lot until the state fulfills its duty to its constituents and guests by providing <br /> proper, fee-less parking in the State Parking Lot. <br /> Pages 15 and 16 of the Special Permit application are so full of bogus claims <br /> that it is an embarrassment: <br /> "No significant visual impacts are expected to occur as the parking lot is <br /> low-lying in nature." <br /> "With regard to historic sites, although no commissioned archaeological <br /> survey of the site was conducted, it is highly unlikely that any historic sites would <br /> be found in the special permit area of the property"... because it has already been <br /> bull-dozed and partially covered with cement! <br /> "The General Plan also emphasizes that developments be mindful of an <br /> area's natural beauty"... which is true of the General Plan but not of this expanded <br /> commercial parking lot on private agriculturally zoned land. <br /> Page 19: See 3H. Valued Cultural Resources..."Specifically, there must be a <br /> discussion of the cultural, historical, and natural resources and associated <br /> traditional and customary practices of this site." I agree... let's discuss it with <br /> people of the land. To continue: "No known archaeological sites, historical, or <br /> cultural resources are known to be located on the property" [92.8 acres]. It is not <br /> known whether the subject site or immediate area was ever used for traditional and <br /> customary rights by native Hawaiians."... People of the land would know but <br /> perhaps not foreign land owners or Caucasian American settlers (a.k.a. malihini). <br /> "However, in the event of documented claims of gathering or access are made of <br /> this site the applicant will honor them." <br /> Page 19, see 31: Public Access—"The subject parcel is not adjacent to or <br /> near any shoreline or mountainous areas,..." However, it is adjacent to the most <br /> sacred waterfall in all Hawaii. To ignore that significance to the people of this land <br /> is to disrespect native Hawaiians and long time residents of the Hawaiian Islands. <br /> Ua mau ke `ia o ka aina i ka pono! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.