Laserfiche WebLink
■ BILL 127 AS CURRENTLY WRITTEN REQUIRES TIMED CONDITIONS IN ALL SITUATIONS, <br /> HOWEVER, FOR THE FOLLOWING CASES TIMED CONDITIONS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE: <br /> ■ A REZONE WHERE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE INTENT (E.G., <br /> REZONING A PROPERTY TO OPEN FOR OPEN SPACE, SCENIC, HISTORIC, CULTURAL <br /> RESOURCE PROTECTION, RECREATIONAL USE, ETC. <br /> ■ WHERE A PROPERTY HAS SPLIT ZONING AND AN APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO ALIGN <br /> ONE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH THE ZONING OF THE REMAINDER OF THE <br /> PROPERTY. SHOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR BE COMPELLED TO ADD A TIMED <br /> CONDITION TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, IT WOULD ONLY APPLY TO A PORTION <br /> OF THE PROPERTY AND NOT THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. <br /> ■ WHEN THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OR COUNCIL INITIATE A ZONING REVERSION TO <br /> THE ORIGINAL ZONING DESIGNATION, THE PLANNING DIRECTOR USUALLY <br /> RECOMMENDS REMOVAL OF ALL CONDITIONS, SO A TIMED CONDITION WOULD <br /> NOT BE APPROPRIATE. <br /> ■ THE COUNCIL SHOULD CONSIDER A PROVISION IN BILL 127 TO EXEMPT THE TIMED <br /> CONDITION REQUIREMENT IN THESE AND SIMILAR SITUATIONS. <br />