Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii Police Commission <br /> Regular Session Minutes <br /> June 21, 2024 <br /> Page 7 <br /> containing criminal justice information to meet FBI standards, requiring compliant <br /> software. The challenge is finding a vendor or software that is compliant, but he doesn't <br /> see why they can't purchase a few licenses and implement it for other department <br /> purposes before implementing them department-wide. In the next 30 days, he will have <br /> Deputy Chief Mahuna update the commission on whether they can purchase licenses <br /> for Ms. Correa to trial. If the software proves useful, they will cover it under their <br /> budget. DCC Frenz advised that HFD purchased a system for LEPC meetings. She <br /> suggested asking the Fire Chief to allow Ms. Correa to utilize the same license and see <br /> how that works while HPD seeks a larger system. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> Correspondence No. 24-15: Communication from County Auditor, Tyler Benner regarding <br /> notification received by the Office of the County Auditor concerning alleged questionable <br /> field practices by the Hawai'i Police Department. <br /> Mr. Benner explained that communication was forwarded to the Police Commission to <br /> encourage a broader discussion on public complaints and inquiries. His office operates a <br /> fraud, waste, and abuse hotline, and the inquiry alleged that the Hawai'i Police Department <br /> arrests individuals for DUI when drug paraphernalia is found in a vehicle. This did not fit <br /> the definitions of fraud or waste but did fit the definition of abuse which includes the misuse <br /> of one's authority and position. The Police Commission as the sole authority entrusted with <br /> governance and oversight of the Police Department, is responsible for such matters. <br /> According to Police Commission Rules, communications from any county agency on policy <br /> matters should be referred to the commission. The Hawai'i County Charter also states that <br /> the Police Commission reviews the department's operations to recommend improvements. <br /> Mr. Benner clarified that they are not asserting the claim's validity. Since the inquiry was <br /> outside the hotline's scope, no investigation was conducted. They referred the matter to <br /> the commission, as required by the commission's rules and the County Charter, to avoid <br /> impeding their work. They welcome dialogue with the department to clarify practices and <br /> seek the commission's guidance on future requests. He emphasized the importance of <br /> providing the public with opportunities to give feedback in a non-confrontational manner. <br /> Currently, their office lacks instructions on facilitating this. <br /> There was further discussion regarding the county auditor's role, investigations, <br /> outsourcing external investigators, unsubstantiated and anonymous complaints, and <br /> employees' rights. <br /> Chief Moszkowicz emphasized that his concern isn't with the content of the anonymous <br /> complaint but more about the timing of receiving it last week. He reached out to the <br /> commission's secretary for a copy and initiated an inquiry with OPS, finding it <br /> unsubstantiated. He emphasized the importance of establishing a clear referral process for <br />