Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai'i Police Commission <br /> Regular Session Minutes <br /> Special Meeting <br /> August 8, 2024 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Commissioner Lacerte expressed that she is more interested in knowing whether discipline <br /> was imposed rather than the specifics of suspensions or terminations. Commissioner <br /> Tavares noted that he doesn't believe they are receiving information about whether <br /> complaints were sustained. Chief Moszkowicz responded that Ms. Correa mentioned this <br /> information is provided to them. Commissioner Lacerte reiterated that her primary concern <br /> is to ensure accountability and to know if any actions were taken. <br /> Vice Chair Bertsch noted that the commission is seeking more detailed information. <br /> Historically, predecessors were very forthcoming and shared ultimate details or at least <br /> answered questions, while others were less forthcoming. He emphasized that it is up to the <br /> chief to provide the commission with the information needed to make well-informed <br /> decisions, within appropriate bounds. Chief Moszkowicz indicated that he is unsure about <br /> what can be shared but is willing to provide information if he is authorized to do so. <br /> Chair Robinson informed the chief that at their next meeting, they will form a working group <br /> to move forward with revisions and will likely seek his input throughout the process. He <br /> thanked the chief for his contributions. <br /> Deputy Corporation Counsel Cody Frenz addressed the commission to clarify a few points. <br /> She explained that OPS attends commission meetings and provides updates on <br /> complaints, including details in the final reports. However, as the chief noted, personnel <br /> files are protected by law, and the commission is not entitled to access them at this time. <br /> According to the Charter and current rules, the commission cannot access personnel file <br /> information until the grievance processes are completed, which includes 90 days after the <br /> highest level of grievance. She advised the chief to withhold such information to avoid <br /> privacy violations, as the Charter and rules do not mandate its disclosure. The commission <br /> will receive updates on whether complaints are founded or unfounded at each hearing <br /> Chair Robinson clarified that the information can be provided once it's legally permissible. <br /> DCC Frenz agreed, stating that it's just a matter of timing. Vice Chair Bertsch <br /> acknowledged this, noting that it's reasonable since there are cases where administrative <br /> remedies have been exhausted, allowing the commission to review and learn from them. <br /> These cases still serve as valuable educational tools, helping the commission gain a better <br /> understanding and avoid feeling uninformed, even if the case is from years ago. Chief <br /> Moszkowicz added that some cases can remain in arbitration for several years. <br /> Vice Chair Bertsch asked Chief Moszkowicz if he could share information on pending <br /> grievances with the commission. Vice Chair Bertsch mentioned that SHOPO had <br /> approached him, questioning why the commission doesn't attend the monthly or quarterly <br /> grievance meetings with the chief. Chief Moszkowicz clarified that such meetings don't <br /> exist in that form. However, regarding the process, he explained that they meet with <br /> SHOPO quarterly and, despite offering to establish a formal process to address grievances <br /> predating his tenure, this has yet to materialize. <br />