Laserfiche WebLink
DeVera, Ashley <br /> From: <br /> <br /> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 10:25 PM <br /> To: Planning General Plan <br /> Subject: Revise Hawaii General Plan Testimony Here <br /> Attachments: Big Island General Plan 2045 Testimony .pdf <br /> Aloha Planning Department <br /> I'm registering a protest as a comment about The General Plan 2045. <br /> I have taken time to review the entire document and I have reached the conclusion that this entire <br /> document reflects a flawed process and a failure to genuinely and effectively consult with the public <br /> and to reflect the genuine and real concerns and needs of Island residents. <br /> This document looks eerily like many of the policy talking points of foreign non-governmental <br /> agencies (WEF, Council of Foreign Relations). This document does not express value for 'aina, for <br /> ohana and community and respect. <br /> • This document reflects a mindset that would clearly erase private property in favor of a <br /> communist agenda of property seizure and acquistions. <br /> • This document openly proposed that our travel be limited which is a violation of the US. <br /> Constitution <br /> • There was no community consultation and no community support for much of the 'rezoning' that <br /> is being proposed. This is maladministration and a fraud. <br /> The justification for limits on freedom to travel, on property acquisition and for transforming our rural <br /> agricultural island into the location for multiple 'urban density' settlements is 'Climate Change' which is <br /> cited in the document in just about every section. <br /> • There is no data provided in the Plan to support assertions of a 'Climate Emergency.' <br /> • Americans are currently seeing the 'carbon narrative'justify the same radical agendas of property <br /> appropriation and confinement expressed in 'Community Plan' documents across the country. <br /> • Many are pointing out that policies being handed down to them strangely'exactly' reflect the goals <br /> of globalist organizations such as United Nations, World Economic Forum and Council of Foreign <br /> Affairs <br /> 1) Primarily the failure of the Planning Department to include a Hilo Community Plan is such a glaring <br /> omission that this General Plan should not proceed until that process is completed to the satisfaction <br /> of the Hilo community. <br /> 2) Further I have a more general objection that this document lacks reference to our economy and <br /> lacks a focus on how the economy can be supported. This omission defies logic and reflects a flawed <br /> set of administrative goals and objectives for this entire exercise. <br />