2024-09-25 PL-INT-2024-008786 GP 2045 Draft Comments - M. Isaac

Home

3) I'm also stating my objection that this document clearly doesn't reflect a consultation with communities on the island created for their benefit and for a future generation to anticipate growth and prosperity. Many of the challenges we currently experience are absent from this plan. • We are a primarily rural island with a vast and under-utilized potential in our agricultural sector and yet this document appears to be heavily slanted toward urban density housing development. • No explanation is provided as to 'why' this is a driving value in this document (but again, pointing out that the proposals for urban density, cluster housing is also the basis for SMART city design and for 15 minute cities built on a premise of monitoring carbon and limiting the freedom to travel) 4) A truly useful planning document would be addressing the need for growth in the agriculture sector but instead we see references to acquistion of private land for the purposes of 'buffer zones' and we see intentions to legislate what farming activities will be 'permitted' on privately owned agricultural lands. These kinds of proposals reek of socialism and inappropriate levels of control. They most certainly don't reflect concerns or demands of our island communities. 5) Instead of references to plans for economic growth we See multiple references in this General Plan to measures that will result accumulation of debt via 'public private partnerships' to finance infrastructure investments (for development projects) and we see suggestions that the island's future will see increased welfare programs. 6) Very concerning are the repeated references to incentives and measures designed to 'limit' vehicular travel since this is a clear and stated intention to violate constitutional rights of every individual to travel freely without interference. 7) To justify measures such as 'limiting' the vehicular travel we see references to 'climate change' which has specifically been challenged as a 'theory.' Carbon modeling has been identified as flawed by over one thousand scientists and 8)Yet one more unconstitutional overreach in this document has to do with interference with property rights. There are people reviewing this plan and discovering that their home is rezoned from residential to 'recreation and conservation.' Many of the public are still unaware of the changes in zoning and they were never informed or consulted ahead of the change in zoning. That designation is referenced in documents from 'Council of Foreign Relations' who originally created Agenda 2021 . This has since been adopted and refined by World Economic Forum and the main objective is to relocate 'human settlement' patterns into high density 'cluster' patterns and to remove humans from areas that are to be designated as 'wild lands.' That our County of Hawaii Planning Department would attempt to rezone property without consultation or engagement with legislature amounts to such gross interference with property rights as to be considered by many as fraud and financial crime. There doesn't seem to be a 'nicer' way to express how serious this appears to be. Again, rezoning private property zero reflects the concerns of our island residents that were expressed at any time during the public consultation process. . 9) A significant objection is that instead of providing a plan for economic growth and sound development, this document reads as a plan for massive levels of development without explanation or context. Which population will be taking up all of the urban development alluded to in this document ? Where is the plan to support the current residents of the island to prosper and flourish? If no economic plan then why and how would it make sense to significantly replace the population? 2