My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-10-04 PL-INT-2024-008914 GP 2045 Draft Comments - M. Melendez
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
General Plan
>
2015 Comp Update
>
Public Input
>
2024 Draft Public Comments
>
2024-10-04 PL-INT-2024-008914 GP 2045 Draft Comments - M. Melendez
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2024 11:21:09 AM
Creation date
10/7/2024 11:47:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
consider amendments to encourage site clustering of development in order to avoid <br /> critical environmental areas and assets." This is also on page 88, 13.15, page 98, 14.4, <br /> page 101, 15.6, page 130, 25.5. Page 232, 1.m. Also, on page 98 you want to amend <br /> the zone to establish "Clustered Rural Subdivision". Clustered homes are NOT how Big <br /> Island residents want to live. Are you "encouragements and incentives" going to be in <br /> the form of more regulations and taxes to get people to do what you want? You don't <br /> think this takes away people's freedoms? <br /> • "Buffer Zone" concern. You have this defined as, "Biosphere Reserve Buffer Zone <br /> (BRBZ) is enacted either separately or as an overlay district for the Volcano area, to <br /> guide development within the region's native forest through regulatory measures and <br /> economic incentives." These last phrases says more fines, permits and code. <br /> "Economic incentives" also says fines or even an increase in taxes. This is NOT pono! <br /> See also page 101, 15i, page 232, 1h, page 233, 10, page 238, 15i. This is very <br /> concerning! <br /> • "Conservation" page 236, 10a is very concerning. This says that you'll amend zoning <br /> codes to keep people out of nature. This is not pono with the people on Big Island! Page <br /> 241, 26i, says clearly that you'll "incentivize" through reducing taxes to make people do <br /> what you want. That is EXTORTION! <br /> • "Stakeholder" is written 26 times and "homeowner" is written ZERO! The definition of <br /> Stakeholder: Stakeholders can include a wide range of entities, such as employees, <br /> customers, suppliers, investors, government agencies, community members, and <br /> non-governmental organizations. It does not say homeowner, farmer or local <br /> resident. Yet, we are to believe that we are included in this definition of "entities". That is <br /> simply not true! <br /> This general plan is a huge concern for many residents. The language in the general plan is <br /> also written in many, if not most, general plans across the nation so how was this plan written <br /> specifically for the Big Island? <br /> You have climate change as a factor for many things in this general plan, yet have you <br /> researched it? <br /> The climate change areas in this plan will further relinquish the rights of people on Big Island. <br /> 1952 credentialed scientists have signed a world declaration stating: There is NO climate <br /> danger! You can find it at Clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/ or simply put, "World Climate <br /> Declaration" into any URL. Climate change is a false narrative that the investors in renewable <br /> energy need people to believe in order for their investments to be profitable. Please do your <br /> research! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.