My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-21 Moku Loa Hawaii Island Sierra Club Testimony (2)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-11-22 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
LPC Testimony 11/21-11/22 Draft GP 2045 (11/22 LPC Meeting)
>
2024-11-21 Moku Loa Hawaii Island Sierra Club Testimony (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2024 12:58:12 PM
Creation date
11/21/2024 12:53:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/21/2024
Description
2024-11-21 Moku Loa Hawaii Island Sierra Club Testimony (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
312
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hawaii County Scenic Resources Inventory and Mapping Project <br /> Likewise, the UDRB and Maui Planning Commission have also not received <br /> sufficient training on scenic resource impact management and mitigation. <br /> 3. Maui Coastal Scenic Resources Study (August 1990). Recognizing these <br /> shortcomings in the SMA permitting process, the County of Maui's Planning <br /> Department commissioned the above-referenced study in 1990 to address <br /> the following gaps: <br /> • Inventory and describe scenic resources within the developed and <br /> developing areas of the SMA; <br /> • Propose measures, if necessary, to improve the quality of these <br /> resources; <br /> • Develop a scenic resources design manual; and <br /> • Establish a training program for Planning Department staff. The study <br /> recommended that the design manual be used by the UDRB as well <br /> for reviewing coastal developments; and the study recommended the <br /> establishment of an in-house evaluation committee to "specialize in <br /> the review of coastal projects." <br /> Unfortunately, the study's recommendations were never implemented by the <br /> Department. The study continues to serve as a resource for both SMA Permit <br /> Applicants and Planning Department staff to help determine if a development <br /> is within an area of the SMA that may contain visual resources. However, the <br /> design manual is rarely used to determine appropriate mitigation and the <br /> training and evaluation programs were never institutionalized. <br /> Recommendations to Improve the Process <br /> Maui County's reliance upon SMA permitting to protect coastal scenic resources could <br /> be significantly improved through enhanced training of Planning Department staff, the <br /> UDRB and the Maui Planning Commission. Practices should be put into place to <br /> produce more consistent documentation of scenic resource impacts and to identify <br /> appropriate mitigation strategies and standards for determining if the development is <br /> consistent with the SMA's scenic resources objectives and policies. Maui County could <br /> amend its SMA Rules (§12-202) to ensure more effective scenic resource protection <br /> through HRS 205A. Such amendments could include the addition of: 1) a design <br /> manual to be used for the mitigation of scenic resource impacts; 2) application content <br /> requirements for projects that produce scenic resource impacts; 3) criteria for <br /> Scenic Resource Protection Programs and Strategies Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.