My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-21 Moku Loa Hawaii Island Sierra Club Testimony (2)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-11-22 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
LPC Testimony 11/21-11/22 Draft GP 2045 (11/22 LPC Meeting)
>
2024-11-21 Moku Loa Hawaii Island Sierra Club Testimony (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2024 12:58:12 PM
Creation date
11/21/2024 12:53:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/21/2024
Description
2024-11-21 Moku Loa Hawaii Island Sierra Club Testimony (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
312
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hawaii County Scenic Resources Inventory and Mapping Project <br /> documenting and evaluating scenic resource impacts; and 4) standards for determining <br /> levels of acceptable impact. Maui County could also better protect its scenic resources <br /> through on-going training of Planning Department staff, UDRB and the Planning <br /> Commission in scenic resource impact evaluation and mitigation. <br /> Applicability to Hawaii County <br /> Much of Maui's urban development has been subject to SMA Permitting, which requires <br /> consistency with the SMA objectives and policies. However, the lack of a defined <br /> process with supporting procedures, criteria and standards together with training has <br /> resulted in only modest protection of the island's coastal scenic resources. Any scenic <br /> resources protection program implemented by Hawaii County should ensure that such <br /> program weaknesses are not apparent. <br /> It is important to note that while some of Hawaii County's urban lands are located within <br /> the SMA, a larger portion are not. In addition, because of its vast and rural nature, <br /> many exceptional and important views in Hawaii County are mountain (mauka) or <br /> agricultural views. Therefore, developments in these areas are not subject to SMA <br /> permitting requirements. <br /> For example, the inventory and mapping study identified many important and <br /> exceptional views in urban areas, such as the Hilo and Waimea views below that are <br /> not located in the SMA. Hawaii County may want to consider amending its SMA <br /> boundary to include some of the coastal exceptional and important views, provided that <br /> --log �� � <br /> 4 <br /> ,. <br /> Hilo and Waimea urban views. <br /> Scenic Resource Protection Programs and Strategies Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.