My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-07-31 Salary Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
2024-07-31 Salary Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2024 3:49:07 PM
Creation date
12/23/2024 3:44:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission July 31, 2024 <br />announcement for the Interim Administrator, so that you could see the salary that was—for that <br />interim period. And then, also, email correspondence from the HR Manager to our Classification <br />and Pay Division, Jamie Martines, providing information regarding a similar office in the City <br />and County of Honolulu. So, just for the Commission's reference. <br />CHR. PAVAO: Thank you. Any other questions? <br />MR. NELSON: So, this is Nelson. Do we—are we setting the salary now or is that what we're <br />going to have the discussion on? Is that the time to make a recommendation for that or <br />MS. FRENZ: Good morning, again, DCC Cody. So, first, we need to unless there's more <br />conversation on the communications, if you want to make a motion to close communication as to <br />those. <br />I think, ultimately, just to answer Commissioner Nelson's question, one of the outstanding <br />matters is the setting of the salary for this agency. So, I don't know you guys—listening to the <br />conversation this morning, I don't know if you have enough information, if you want to further <br />dialogue, if you want to seek additional information to be prepared to consider what that <br />proposed salary would actually be. <br />It's been interesting dialogue here this morning, and based on some of the questions, I'm not sure <br />where you guys are at in that regard. So, that's a "Commissioner" question, quite frankly. But, <br />theoretically, that would be something <br />MR. NELSON: Okay. We could start on it. Okay, so basically, when Ms. Kimball came in and <br />she said, "Okay, I would recommend the salary range for 125 to 150—okay. So, I would <br />proposeI mean, this is a new thing. It's like a (inaudible)—it's an odd thing, but I would <br />propose we just go with a salary 125—okay. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: I agree. <br />MR. NELSON: At the bottom scale. And we could revisit it, again, in a year when we see what <br />the grants that came in, whether it's self—whether it really is self-sustaining or not I mean, that <br />was part of (inaudible). <br />So, I would propose that we set salary at 125, which is what the requested salary is. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: I agree, I agree that's a great starting point and just holding it for a year. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: Commissioner Namahoeis that then a pay decrease from what she has <br />currently? <br />MS. GREENBAUM: She has 108. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: 108—so then, 125 is an increase. <br />Page 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.