My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-02-03 Jim McMahon Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-02-06 - Windward
>
Item #2 Teppy Mountain, LLC (PL-SPP-2024-000075)
>
2025-02-03 Jim McMahon Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2025 9:40:21 AM
Creation date
2/6/2025 9:40:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
agricultural operation, it seems difficult to justify the co-location of other commercial activities on <br /> the farm. What if the heavy equipment rental operation is more profitable than the ranching <br /> operation? Shouldn't there be income thresholds and therefore some amount of financial <br /> disclosure before approval just as for agritourism? This is similar to the argument around <br /> allowing transient rental accommodations and other non-farm uses on agricultural land. <br /> To allow non-agricultural commercial uses on farm land would seem to represent a kind of <br /> subsidy. Rather than having to pay for a 2nd property zoned commercial or industrial site to host <br /> the non-farm use, one can move all of these activities to a AG-zoned lot. There they can enjoy <br /> reduced property tax based on the dedicated use value. Meanwhile a non-farmer engaged in <br /> the same commercial activity will have to pay higher taxes for their conforming parcel where <br /> their business would be located. Thus this would seem to provide an unfair subsidy to the <br /> farmer. <br /> Special Considerations for Private Road Easements <br /> Regrettably, we have had to request law enforcement support dealing with various illegal and <br /> unsafe activities taking place within our road easements. This includes: <br /> • Various forms of harassment resulting in temporary restraining orders, <br /> • Operating vehicles in an unsafe and threatening manner when there are presestrains <br /> present along the roadside. <br /> • Damaging our property through the unauthorized removal of speed bumps, trees, and <br /> herbicide usage. Damage of other personal property located near the road and <br /> elsewhere within the property <br /> • Agricultural theft of both produce and equipment <br /> • Driving off the paved areas and onto the shoulders with heavy vehicles in an apparent <br /> attempt to damage the underground electrical utilities supplying electricity and <br /> telecommunications services to our house. <br /> • Excessive use of Jacobs (AKA Jake or Compression Release Engine) Brakes at all <br /> hours of the day and night <br /> • Frequent "Coal Rolling" <br /> • Frequent distracted and impaired driving <br /> • Allowing unaccompanied minors to operate motor vehicles <br /> • Recreational use of our road by operating ATVs and similar recreational vehicles on the <br /> road without permission <br /> • Improperly secured loads resulting in litter and other debris on our roads. <br /> The police have very limited ability to enforce traffic and other areas of civil law on private roads. <br /> Also, we have no HOA to other organizations that could possibly intervene on our behalf. We <br /> are therefore mostly on our own when dealing with these challenges. We would therefore like to <br /> make the Planning Commission more appreciative of some of the additional and often <br /> unexpected challenges private road owners may have to deal with as a consequence of <br /> increased use that those fortunate to live on public roads would be less likely to have to deal <br /> with. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.