|
place
<br /> Table 3. Net Capacity(Capped)by FAZ
<br /> Residential 1111
<br /> Multifamily
<br /> . e
<br /> 22,299 1,183 7,037,091 6,766,170
<br /> 8,721 1,173,273 894,155
<br /> 50
<br /> 9,691 39 579,692 133,073
<br /> 6,807 827 1,242,247 577,334
<br /> 9,950 231 1,660,320 1,499,805
<br /> 15,237 1,944,304 310,342
<br /> ... .. � 3,815
<br /> North Kona 21,855 5,376 9,831,956 12,956,188
<br /> 21,445 190 539,714 0
<br /> 25,088 1971 768,304 620,075
<br /> 5,518 1 75 1,481,939 1 4,484,680
<br /> - 25,390 1 31 1 135,975 1 0
<br /> 9,996 1 0 0 1 0
<br /> 25,928 151 656,727 74,451
<br /> 207,925 13,939 27,051,542 28,316,273
<br /> Desirability
<br /> Desirability is a complex topic and represented a large proportion of the effort for this task.
<br /> The desirability of a given parcel for a given use (residential or commercial) is represented by a score
<br /> from o(least desirable)to ioo(most desirable). A parcel that is not eligible for a given use is assigned a
<br /> desirability score of-i. On a map, the pattern of desirability scores is sometimes called a "desirability
<br /> surface"because one can picture a lumpy blanket covering the island with high points in areas of high
<br /> desirability and low points in areas of low desirability.
<br /> Desirability was calculated all at once for the entire island. Given more time and resources, it would be
<br /> possible to perform separate calculations for subareas such as east/west or individual FAZs. However,
<br /> the additional effort would make little difference because growth amounts are constrained to meet
<br /> FAZ-specific totals and thus growth is allocated based on relative desirability scores within a FAZ, not
<br /> between FAZs.
<br /> Trend Scenario and Land Use Allocation Technical Report 6
<br />
|