2024-12-03 Noah Walin, Pacific Rim Land Inc. Testimony

Home

i reasons for the granting of the permit, and d)the time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). Further, should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Director shall initiate procedures to revolve the permit. 25. No public testimony was received by the Planning Commission. After due deliberation, at its meeting on December 17, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Application to the LUC by a vote of 5 in favor and 2 excused. 26. On January 11, 2016,the LUC received a copy of the Planning Commission's decision and the record of the Planning Commission's proceedings on the Application. 27. On January 26, 2016, Applicant submitted to the LUC the $1,000.00 filing fee by check payable to the State of Hawaii. 28. On February 1, 2016,the LUC mailed a notice and meeting agenda to all parties and the Statewide, Oahu and Hawaii mailing lists. 29. On February 8, 2016,Applicant filed its Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order ("Proposed Order"). 30. On February 9, 2016,the LUC met in Kona, island of Hawaii,to consider the Petition. Jennifer A. Lim, Esq. and Jason Macey appeared on behalf of the Applicant; Daryn Arai and Danny B. Patel, Esq., Deputy Corporation Counsel, appeared on behalf of the County; and, Deputy Attorney General Bryan Yee, Esq., appeared on behalf of OP. The 13 SP92-381 Waikoloa Development Company Decision And Order on Motion to Amend