2025-05-29 Fire Commission Minutes

Home

Regular Session Minutes May 29, 2025 Page 10 step in if the situation arises again. However, the mayor and managing director noted that Micah has a full workload. Commissioner Cushnie inquired about the letters previously sent to the former administration regarding this issue. Vice Chair Wolf recalled that DCC Wong was supposed to follow up with the administration about identifying a backup.Commissioner Hirakami noted that it also affectsthe Police Commission. DCC Salas-Ferguson confirmed there is currently no backup in place and noted that Micah is aware of the issue. When asked if there is a contingency plan in place, Ms. Correastated there is not. Chair Kosaki asked if the previous letter is still on file; Ms. Correaconfirmed that it is. He suggested reviewing it at the next meeting to possibly resend it to the current administration. DCC Salas-Ferguson recommended adding the letter to the agenda for consideration and potential adoption. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Rule 5(a)(1):Chair Kosaki noted that previous attempts to vote for the chair and vice chairwere delayed due to not havingthe full commission present and a deadlock in votes. He asked whether the commission could proceed with the prior nominations. DCC Salas-Ferguson recommended reopening nominations and allowing candidates to make brief statements before conducting a roll call vote, with five votes needed to elect achair. Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2025: Commissioner Perrin nominated Commissioner Hirakami for chair, and Vice Chair Wolf nominated Chair Kosaki. Both accepted their nominations. Commissioner Hirakami shared that he brings experience from otherboards and commissions and aims to run meetings efficiently and effectively. He emphasized his commitment as a volunteer and his desire to make the most of meeting time. Chair Kosaki spoke about his 29 years of experience with the Fire Department, his intent to support the chief, and his focus on departmental and community safety with no personal agenda. Commissioner Magsalin asked Hirakami about his involvement in revising the chief’s evaluation. He explained thathe felt the original form lacked opportunities to identify areas for improvement. Drawing from his experience on the water board, he believed a more comprehensive evaluation would be beneficial. Commissioner Hanano raised a concern about Hirakami’s earlier comment on running faster meetings, noting the importance of careful deliberation, especially given the department’s $80 million budget. Hirakami clarified that he meant greater efficiency,