Laserfiche WebLink
HHF PLANNERS <br /> PLANNING DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF HAWAI'I - places for people <br /> F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY <br /> THIS SERVICE CATEGORY NUMBER <br /> (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. <br /> Complete one Section F for each project.) 2 <br /> 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED <br /> Pu'uhonua o Honaunau National Historical PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) <br /> Park Remove & Replace Park Maintenance Ongoing n/a <br /> Facilities EA <br /> Honaunau-Napo'opo'o, Hawai'i Island <br /> 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION <br /> a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER <br /> Hennebery Eddy Will Ives, AIA (503)227-4860 <br /> Architects for National <br /> Park Service <br /> 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS SERVICE CATEGORY(Include scope,size, and cost) <br /> HHF prepared a Federal National Environmental Policy Act "- ._.. <br /> (NEPA) Environmental Assessment(EA)fora project to <br /> relocate existing Pu'uhonua o Honaunau National Historical PARR <br /> i ENTRANCE , <br /> Park maintenance and resource management functions from A . VISITOR CENTER <br /> their current location in substandard facilities in an area ,' AE KEAWE <br /> known to contain archeological resources to new facilities at THE GREAT WALL <br /> p ROVAL GROIJNO <br /> a more suitable location.The seven existing structures were �... ` <br /> constructed as temporary facilities in the 1960s and are no <br /> PICNIC AREA <br /> longer physically adequate to meet current Park needs. <br /> Their location does not support the Park's fundamental %y '\-7< <br /> resources and values as expressed in its cultural landscape. <br /> HHF evaluated impacts on key environmental issue areas in ���► <br /> three NPS-owned project sites(two within the main Park Eland. awarl <br /> COASTAIiRr:L� `oRR <br /> boundaries and one site three miles mauka); prepared <br /> materials in support of the project's Endangered Species Act -p IR i - <br /> Section 7 consultation; prepared NEPA scoping meeting <br /> graphic materials; and oversaw biological surveys of all three <br /> sites. <br /> Project Cost: $137,906 "77 I °, <br /> 25. FIRMS INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT <br /> (1) FIRM NAME 2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE <br /> a. AECOS, Inc. Honolulu, Hawai'i Biological Resources Survey <br />