2025-12-10 Cultural Resources Commission Meeting

Home

contaminants entering the water and affecting fish resources that are consumed by the community. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:01:46] Commissioner Six added that while the APE was being considered, indirect effects should also be accounted for, such as lead contamination entering the stream or ocean and affecting areas where people hunt or gather resources. Chair Clark noted that with archaeological sites, the focus is on tangible evidence of the past that can be documented and submitted to SHPD but acknowledged that the area has a long history and could be considered a potential historic property. Regarding the park, a Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA) had been prepared, which examined the river and its historical connections and provided recommendations based on that analysis. Chair Clark further noted because the EA will be a part of the project, studies addressing the stream, as well as biological and botanical resources, would be conducted. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:04:38] Commissioner Kinney commented on lead contamination, noting that certain plants can absorb lead into their leaves and stems. He referenced plants such as Ho'io and Warabi, which are traditionally gathered for food. He emphasized that while this is primarily an environmental assessment, it also intersects with cultural considerations, including the traditional uses of plants, animals, and fish from the area. He noted that although the landscape and archaeological structures have changed over time, cultural traditions continue. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:06:39] Vice Chair Haumea added that the work would benefit future generations and help protect people who are not yet present. Commissioner Kinney recommended reaching out to individuals who gather resources in these areas, including fishermen, to engage in "talk story" conversations to understand what they do, why they do it, how often they visit the area, and how they might be impacted by the project. [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:08:31] Commissioner Gamayo motioned to direct staff to prepare a letter summarizing the comments made during the meeting and, upon approval by the Chair,transmit it to the appropriate recipients. Vice Chair Haumea seconded the motion. A brief discussion occurred.A roll call vote was taken,and the motion passed with six ayes(Keakealani, Kinney, Haumea, Six, Clark, Gamayo). This matter concluded at 11:18 a.m. 3. `Ainako Subdivision Housing Project Consultation Request (PL-CRC-2025-000022) Location: Ahupua`a of Punahoa 2 and Pi`ihonua, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i TMK: (3) 2-3-030:001 (por.), 004, and 2-3-031:001 (por.) [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:10:39] This agenda item was called to order at 11:18 a.m. There were no members of the public present, and no public testimony was provided. Chair Clark disclosed that he had participated in archaeological fieldwork for the project and therefore needed to recuse himself. Vice Chair Haumea assumed the role of chair for the remainder of the discussion. Cultural Resources Commission December 10,2025 Minutes Page 6 of 10