My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-11-10 Minutes APPROVED
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025-11-10 Minutes APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2026 9:07:06 AM
Creation date
4/9/2026 9:07:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
know the acreage. Cmr. Britt also noted multiple misspellings in the materials. She <br /> suggested that in the future, Ms. Parsons run spell check and correct the errors. <br /> Cmr. Ward asked whether Ms. Parsons understood that funds would not be available <br /> until 2027. She noted that her application listed 2025 activities that did not align with <br /> the grant cycle. Ms. Parsons stated that she was not aware of the timing. Ms. Parsons <br /> also stated that she had not known that a nonprofit already stewarded the site. She said <br /> she had tried to find a property without existing support and found the application <br /> confusing. <br /> Cmr. Goodoni asked if Ms. Parsons planned restoration work on the pond. Ms. Parsons <br /> said yes. Cmr. Goodoni noted that restoration in a fishpond or other wetland required <br /> permits and that approvals could take time. She advised the applicant to plan <br /> accordingly. <br /> Commissioners asked whether Ms. Parsons had connected with local groups working at <br /> Kawa. She stated that she had not. Commissioners encouraged her to make those <br /> connections and offered to assist her in doing so. Ms. Parsons welcomed that offer. <br /> Cmr. Chang asked staff whether the applicant had submitted bylaws, noting that bylaws <br /> were required. Ms. Braman stated that staff had not received them. <br /> Cmr. Chang then said she lacked basic information about the organization, including its <br /> mission and purposes, because the bylaws were missing. She questioned why the <br /> application was accepted without the required documents and stated that reviewing <br /> incomplete applications was not the best use of the commission's time. <br /> V. Chr. Crivello asked whether staff should withhold applications that lacked required <br /> documents. She noted that the commission could not approve an application without <br /> the minimum documents and questioned why such items were placed on the agenda. <br /> The discussion reflected a preference that Finance not forward incomplete or <br /> noncompliant applications to the commission. <br /> Ms. Kekai explained that staff had allowed items through based on past practice, where <br /> applicants could supply documents after submission. She added that Finance planned to <br /> implement a grants system that would require all required documents to be uploaded <br /> before submission, which would prevent incomplete applications from reaching the <br /> commission. She said staff had given applicants the benefit of the doubt this cycle <br /> because the system was not yet in place. <br /> Minutes of November 10, 2025 <br /> Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.