My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-11-10 Minutes APPROVED
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025-11-10 Minutes APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2026 9:07:06 AM
Creation date
4/9/2026 9:07:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOTION: <br /> V. Chr Crivello moved that application 26-01 be denied for failure to meet the <br /> requirements of the Charter and Hawai'i County Code. Seconded by Cmr. Britt. <br /> VOTE: <br /> Ayes: Commissioners Chang, Ward, Britt, Goodoni,V. Chr. Crivello, and Chair <br /> Rosa —6. <br /> Noes: None. <br /> b. STU.26-02, Kohanaiki'Ohana—Malama O'oma Stewardship Project <br /> Applicant, Karen Eoff, came forward to engage in the discussion with the commission. <br /> Ms. Eoff briefly introduced herself and shared some information about her organization. <br /> Cmr. Britt asked about the fencing. Ms. Eoff said fencing had not progressed, and goats <br /> continued to browse. She described an ineffective electric fence and said they used <br /> noise to deter herds but remained concerned about losses. <br /> Chr. Rosam cautioned against planting before fencing because goats could remove <br /> sensitive species quickly. Ms. Eoff said the group delayed planting while expecting the <br /> fence within about 45 days, but plants risked dying in the nursery, so they out planted <br /> many. <br /> Ms. Eoff said her husband served as director and project manager. She said the team <br /> included paid workers,volunteers, and limited community service placements for low <br /> level offenses. She described recent weeding work by one participant. <br /> Ms. Kekai reported that an RFQ for the fence came in at over$50,000,which triggered a <br /> formal bid process with detailed specifications and a Public Works review. She said that <br /> procurement timelines, not the applicant, were the main cause of the delay, and staff <br /> were pressing Public Works to release the bid. <br /> Ms. Kekai said the design followed MRCS ungulate fencing guidelines at roughly 75 <br /> inches in height with a smooth top strand, with vehicle and pedestrian gates. Ms. Eoff <br /> said that pedestrian gates feel welcoming. <br /> Ms. Braman stated that the bid included about 2,000 linear feet of fencing. Ms. Eoff <br /> estimated an enclosure of about five to six acres. <br /> V. Chr. Crivello asked for confirmation that survey and archaeological documentation <br /> would protect cultural features during installation. Ms. Kekai confirmed. <br /> Minutes of November 10, 2025 <br /> Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.