Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 26-04: Chang, Markoff, Britt, Rosam (alternate) <br /> 26-05: Chang, Markoff, Rosam <br /> 26-06: Rosam, Brandt, Chang, Markoff, Lawson (alternate) <br /> 26-07: Britt <br /> 26-08: Brandt, Rosam, Britt, Lawson <br /> <br />Seconded by Cmr. Markoff. <br /> <br />VOTE TO AMEND THE MOTION: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Brandt, Markoff, Rosam, Lawson, V. Chr. Britt, Chr. Chang <br />Noes: None. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION AS AMENDED: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Brandt, Markoff, Rosam, Lawson, V. Chr. Britt, Chr. Chang <br />Noes: None. <br /> <br />Chr. Chang reminded the commissioners that written site visit reports were due no later than April <br />27. She stated that an optional format was available for use and added that the Mayor’s annual <br />report from the prior year could also be reviewed for examples of how site visits were presented. <br />She noted that the optional format generally covered what was needed. <br /> <br /> <br />VII. OLD BUSINESS: <br />1. Review and adopt the revised Stewardship Grant Review Worksheet. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br />Cmr. Rosam moved to adopt the proposed revised Stewardship Grant Review Worksheet drafted <br />by the Permitted Interaction Group. Seconded by V. Chr. Britt. <br /> <br />Chr. Chang provided background on the revised Stewardship Grant Review Worksheet. She stated <br />that the Commission had previously formed a Permitted Interaction Group, which prepared the <br />revised worksheet now before the Commission. She explained that the worksheet is intended to <br />assist the Commission in reviewing stewardship grant applications and noted that, unlike the <br />suggestion review process, it is not a scoring tool used to assign percentages, but rather an <br />assessment tool and guideline for the Commission’s use. <br /> <br />Chr. Chang further explained that the proposed revisions included formatting improvements, such <br />as adding more space for the project name. She also stated that a new question had been added <br />on page five asking whether the stewardship group had continued to engage the community and <br />lineal descendants, and noted that this question was intended specifically for repeat applicants. <br />She added that the final amendment was the addition, at the bottom of page five, of an applicant <br />overall assessment section, emphasizing that it was meant to be an assessment rather than a <br />score. <br /> <br />VOTE: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Brandt, Markoff, Rosam, Lawson, V. Chr. Britt, Chr. Chang <br />Noes: None. <br /> <br />DRAFT v.1 BS - Minutes of March 9, 2026 <br />Page 19 <br /> <br /> <br />