Laserfiche WebLink
Appellant' s failure to file within the 30-day deadline. See ROA at Page 29. Appellant <br /> did not appeal the Board's dismissal nor did Appellant file a Board appeal following the <br /> consolidation the 0.699 acre non-contiguous area in 2010. See ROA at Page 29. <br /> Following the County's filing of a motion for summary judgment on all claims, <br /> the Third Circuit entered a Final Judgment in favor of the County and against Appellant <br /> in 2012. See ROA at Page 29. Appellant appealed the Third Circuit Court's decision to <br /> the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals ("ICA"). See ROA at Page 30. The ICA <br /> vacated the lower court's Final Judgment and remanded for an order of dismissal. See <br /> ROA at Page 29. Appellant applied to the Hawai'i Supreme Court ("HISC"), and in 2014 <br /> ("Kellberg I") the HISC opined only on the appealability of the Director's decisions and <br /> remanded the case to the ICA for consideration of the remaining issues. See ROA at <br /> Pages 29-30. <br /> On remand, the ICA vacated the Third Circuit Court's judgment and remanded to <br /> the Third Circuit Court. See ROA at Page 30. Before the Third Circuit Court ruled, the <br /> County petitioned to the HISC asking the Court: whether it was error to declare the <br /> subdivision invalid when it now consisted of six, not seven, lots; whether the ICA should <br /> have considered all the County's arguments; and whether the owners of the lots in the <br /> affected subdivision must be joined as parties prior to voiding the subdivision. See ROA <br /> at Page 30. <br /> The HISC, in its April 15, 2015 decision ("Kellberg II"), vacated the ICA's <br /> judgment and the Third Circuit Court's judgment and remanded the case to the Third <br /> Circuit once again. Finding that the lots owners were indispensable parties, the HISC <br /> 3 <br />