Laserfiche WebLink
directed that the Third Circuit Court order that they be made parties if feasible. See ROA <br /> at Page 30. <br /> On remand at the Third Circuit Court,Appellant filed an amended complaint on <br /> December 2, 2015, adding the lot owners as defendants and, among other counts, seeking <br /> a finding that SUB-05-00064 was invalid. See ROA at Page 30. On July 23, 2019, the <br /> Third Circuit Court issued its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and <br /> Order as to Counts I Through V(Inclusive) of the First Amended Complaint. See ROA at <br /> Page 30. The Third Circuit Court stated that because Counts I through V, inclusive, of <br /> the First Amended Complaint were all predicated upon a determination as to whether <br /> SUB 05-00064 was invalid and Appellant was not entitled to relief on such a <br /> determination, all of Counts I through V, inclusive were dismissed with prejudice. Final <br /> Judgment in favor of the County was issued on November 4, 2019. See ROA at Page 30. <br /> Appellant appealed once again and the ICA issued a Summary Disposition Order <br /> on June 27, 2024, affirming the Third Circuit Court's Final Judgment for the County <br /> ("Kellberg III"). See ROA at Page 30. The HISC rejected Appellant's application for <br /> writ certiorari on November 27, 2024. See ROA at Page 30. <br /> APPENDIX A-1 <br /> CHAPTER 23 <br /> SUBDIVISIONS <br /> Section 23-3. Definitions. Whenever used in this chapter, the following words and <br /> phrases, unless the context otherwise requires, shall be defined as indicated: <br /> (21) "Pre-existing lot"means a specific area of land that will be treated as a legal <br /> lot of record based on criteria set forth in this chapter. <br /> Section 23-7. Applicability to consolidation or resubdivision action. The requirements <br /> and standards of this chapter shall not apply to consolidation and resubdivision action <br /> 4 <br />