My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-02-05 Kellberg's Pre-Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-205-000124)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
PL-BOA-2025-000124 Mark Kellberg (PD)
>
2026-02-05 Kellberg's Pre-Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-205-000124)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2026 3:28:13 PM
Creation date
2/11/2026 3:28:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Department's Rules of Practice and Procedure does not require joinder of any party, the Planning <br /> Director's conclusion fails for two reasons. <br /> First, the very purpose of declaratory rulings is to avoid eventual, adversarial litigation. <br /> Chapter 632 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes,which analogously establishes declaratory judgments, <br /> states, "Its purpose is to afford relief from the uncertainty and insecurity attendant upon <br /> controversies over legal rights, without requiring one of the parties interested so to invade the <br /> rights asserted by the other as to entitle the party to maintain an ordinary action . . . It is to be <br /> liberally interpreted and administered, with a view to making the courts more serviceable tot the <br /> people." HRS § 632-6. The Hawaii Supreme Court reinforced this legislative intent, stating that <br /> "the intent of the act is to have the courts render declaratory judgments which may guide parties <br /> in their future conduct in relation to each other with a view rather to avoid liti a.on than in aid of <br /> it." Kaleikau v. Hall, 27 Haw. 420, 428 (1923). Therefore, the Planning Director's rationale that <br /> a declaratory ruling is inappropriate absent Kellberg suing the Lot Owners directly contradicts the <br /> express purpose of declaratory rulings. Second, the Lot Owners have nonetheless been joined into <br /> this BOA appeal, thereby mooting any joinder argument. See Affidavit of Mailing dated January <br /> 22, 2026, filed on January 26, 2026. The Planning Director's reluctance to issue a declaratory <br /> ruling on the questions presented in Kellberg's Petition invites unnecessary litigation and <br /> undermines the purpose of the declaratory ruling process. The Planning Director is empowered to <br /> reconcile the effects of the Subdivision's mistaken approval with the requirements of the County <br /> Code, and a declaratory ruling is the most appropriate way to do so. <br /> VI. COUNTY AND LANDOWNERS' CONTINUING OBLIGATIONS TO COMPLY <br /> Several provisions note the County's and Landowners' continuing obligations to comply <br /> with the zoning and subdivision codes. See supra n.l. Any and all development permits must <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.