My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-06-20 PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 OCEANSIDE, LLC PL-INT-2024-007028 Record on Appeal
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-06-20 PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 OCEANSIDE, LLC PL-INT-2024-007028 Record on Appeal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 2:29:26 PM
Creation date
6/25/2024 2:30:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
6/20/2024
Description
COMPLETE RECORD ON APPEAL
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Oceanside, recorded in the State of Hawaii Bureau of Conveyances on April 30, 1998 (the <br /> "Development Agreement") and County of Hawaii Ordinance No. 96-07 and 96-08 which were <br /> incorporated into the Development Agreement("Incorporated Ordinances"). <br /> Specifically, Petitioner requests the Department to issue declaratory ruling as to the <br /> following: <br /> 1. Determine whether the Planning Director has the authority to determine—under the <br /> HRS, Hawaii Charter, County Code, and the Development Agreement—whether <br /> Oceanside is currently in compliance with the terms of the Development Agreement. <br /> 2. Determine whether the Planning Director has the authority—under the HRS, Hawaii <br /> Charter, County Code and Development Agreement—to determine material breaches <br /> of the Development Agreement. <br /> 3. Determine which County official, if any, has the power to excuse a breach of the <br /> Development Agreement. <br /> 4. Whether Oceanside has, within the timeframe allotted, completed the following: <br /> a. designed and constructed/built the roads required under the Development <br /> Agreement and Incorporated Ordinances; and <br /> b. dedicated the roads required under the Development Agreement and <br /> Incorporated Ordinances. <br /> 5. Whether Resolution No. 317-12 ("Resolution") and the Variance 10-027 ("Variance") <br /> improperly amended the Development Agreement and Incorporated Ordinances. <br /> 6. Whether Variance is unlawful, impermissible, and not authorized under Hawaii law. <br /> 7. Whether Petitioner received notice of the Variance, as required under the express <br /> dictate of County law. <br /> 8. Whether obligations in a development agreement can be excused by Variance under <br /> the Hawaii Constitution, HRS, Hawaii Charter, County Code, and Development <br /> Agreement. <br /> 9. Determine whether the Resolution, as an improper attempt to amend the Development <br /> Agreement and Incorporated Ordinances, required notice to Petitioner which was not <br /> provided. <br /> 2 <br /> 843682 <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.