Laserfiche WebLink
WAN: So, I'm just going to note that Noe, Lisa, and Scott all voted in the affirmative, although <br /> the mics didn't all catch it. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, I'll make a motion to amend the excuse me—the findings of fact to add number <br /> ten. And the proposed language is as follows, the Board found that the order addressed the <br /> questions raised by the appellant in its appeal, even if the Director did not provide the level of <br /> clarity or specifics desired by the appellant. So, I would entertain a second to that. <br /> MARTIN: Second. <br /> LEWIS: All right, all—discussion. Any discussion? Okay, then we'll vote on that. All in favor to <br /> that. Noe— <br /> WAN: Are there any nays? <br /> LEWIS: Any nays? Thank you. <br /> ALL BOARD MEMBERS: [all voted in favor]. <br /> WAN: Hearing and seeing none, that motion passes. <br /> LEWIS: That motion passes. <br /> WAN: So, the motion has been amended now twice? <br /> LEWIS: Right. I have too many things here. Here is it. Okay, this is five of them or four. <br /> WAN: So, Chair, let's take them each in each in turn if you have five different items. <br /> LEWIS: It's easier, yeah. Okay, now I'll make a motion to amend the findings of fact to and <br /> conclusions of law—I'm calling just for shorthand, I'm calling this document findings of fact, <br /> but I want to amend the conclusions of law, and we'll start with one of them. Okay, the first would <br /> be number two—I'm look—hang on a minute. <br /> All right, the first one will—I'll do them one at a time just for clarity. So, the first one will be <br /> number—would be numbered five. It would be a different number five, and it would state the <br /> following, the Director acted within his jurisdiction, when the Director addressed the posed <br /> questions in his order. That is the first proposal. <br /> WAN: So,just for clarity sake Chair, what you're proposing is that under the conclusions of law <br /> section, to appear after paragraph four, which would be a new paragraph five. Would be the <br /> language you stated, the Director acted within his jurisdiction when the Director addressed the <br /> posed questions in the order, is that correct? <br /> LEWIS: Correct. <br /> WAN: Okay. So, that's a motion to amend. <br /> LEWIS: It is a motion to amend. <br /> SAIKI: I second the motion. <br /> MARTIN: Second. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> Page 4 <br />