Laserfiche WebLink
LEWIS: Okay—I'll— <br /> WAN: I'm not sure who was first, but I heard Scott first, so I'm going to have Scott as the second. <br /> LEWIS: Everybody wants to second, but that's—all right any discussion on that? All right, we'll <br /> take a vote. All in favor say aye. <br /> WAN: Can the members do that one more time with your mics on? <br /> LEWIS: All in favor, please say aye. All opposed? <br /> ALL BOARD MEMBERS: [all voted in favor]. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, that passes. All right, my second amendment, proposed amendment is going to <br /> follow next. So, this will be a new six, a new paragraph six. And it will state, the order correctly <br /> identified issues outside of the Director's jurisdiction and discretion. Everybody— <br /> SURPRENANT: Point of clarification, Chair. A new six, so you have a new five, which means <br /> the existing five, will be six. <br /> LEWIS: Just bump them down. <br /> SURPRENANT: This is a new six, under the new five. <br /> WAN: No. <br /> LEWIS: Correct, she's right. <br /> SURPRENANT: And therefore, the existing five will become seven. <br /> LEWIS: Right, that's what—so it just bumps every—bumps the last one down. <br /> SURPRENANT: Okay, I just want to be clear, so we know. Thank you. <br /> LEWIS: Absolutely. Yeah, all right now—so right, I need a second. <br /> MCNAMARRA: I'll second it. <br /> LEWIS: Thank you. Discussion please, any discussion? All right then, all in favor please indicate <br /> with aye. Any opposed? <br /> ALL BOARD MEMBERS: [all voted in favor]. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, so hearing none, that motion passes, that amendment. Okay I've got two more, so <br /> then the next one will be a new paragraph seven. I move to amend the order to add the new—a <br /> new paragraph seven under the conclusions of law. This would be, the order sufficiently addressed <br /> the questions raised by the appellant, even though the order did not reflect the specifics desired by <br /> the appellant. And—that's it. Would you like me to repeat that? <br /> MARTIN: Yes. <br /> LEWIS: The order sufficiently addressed the questions raised by the appellant, even though the <br /> order did not reflect the specifics desired by the appellant. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> Page 5 <br />