My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-12-13 Exh A Transcript 1250 OCEANSIDE LLC (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-12-13 Exh A Transcript 1250 OCEANSIDE LLC (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2025 2:38:46 PM
Creation date
1/15/2025 2:39:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MARTIN: Second. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, we got a second. Any discussion? All right, all in favor of this say aye. All <br /> opposed—I'm sorry, all opposed? <br /> ALL BOARD MEMBERS: [all voted in favor]. <br /> LEWIS: Hearing none, that amendment passes that motion for an amendment passes. And I have <br /> one more proposed amendment and that's going to be a new number eight. In the conclusions of <br /> law, and it would state, appellant's argued a lack of clarity and/or specifics in the Director's <br /> responses, but that did not meet the burden required for modifying or remanding the Planning <br /> Director's decision. <br /> I'm going to repeat that since that's a little dense there. All right, appellant's argued lack of clarity <br /> and/or specifics in the Director's responses,but that did not meet the burden required for modifying <br /> or remanding the Planning Director's decision. <br /> SAIKI: I second that amendment. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, any discussion? All right, all in favor, please say aye. Any opposed? <br /> ALL BOARD MEMBERS: [all voted in favor]. <br /> LEWIS: All right, that hearing none that motion and amendment passes. And April,just for clarity <br /> then that leaves that one last original. All right. <br /> WAN: So, for clarity the original paragraph five as proposed, would become paragraph nine under <br /> conclusions of law. <br /> LEWIS: And I have one final sort of rewording I'd like to propose. In the decision and order itself, <br /> which is the—and actually the very last paragraph of this document. Do you all want to take— <br /> turn to that. Where it says appellant's appeal of, I'd like to cross out that language and begin with <br /> the Planning Director's and then continue all the way as written, until it says is denied and cross <br /> out denied and say affirmed. <br /> So now it's going to read,if the motion passes, it will read the Planning Director's April 29th,2024, <br /> Zendo Kern, Planning Director, County of Hawai`i's declaratory order in the matter of C & J <br /> Coupe Family Limited Partnership, petitioner docket number 24-0001 is affirmed. And then the <br /> last sentence remains unchanged. Basically, oh go ahead. <br /> MCNAMARRA: I'll second that. <br /> LEWIS: Thank you, any discussion? We're just basically turning a negative into a positive kind <br /> of— <br /> WAN: And just for record of clarity sake, that is the last paragraph on the decision and order, first <br /> sentence is being amended in that fashion. <br /> LEWIS: Correct. Correct. Okay, any other discussion? All right then I'll take a vote, any—all— <br /> WAN: I'm sorry, did we have a second, oh Lisa seconded. Okay, sorry. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.