Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: They have not indicated that to me. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Okay, so the public can't access into their property from the end of this road? <br /> BAILEY: Objection as to relevance, outside the scope of this appeals— <br /> LEWIS: Sustain. <br /> BAILEY: —this hearing. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Okay, so let's focus on construction standards briefly. If this road was built to <br /> urban dedicable standards, what would that mean? <br /> VITOUSEK: Be more hardened surface, wider paving curbs, gutters sidewalks, more potential for <br /> storm water runoff. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: So, more concrete. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Okay, and it would be less rural that it's built right now. <br /> VITOUSEK: Correct. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Okay, let's get to the heart of Oceanside's position on this matter. So, right <br /> now ordinance 96-8 requires dedication of the connector road and the Makai Halekii extension <br /> road, right? <br /> VITOUSEK: Correct. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: And there's been discussions about what sort of construction is required. <br /> Urban dedicable standard or not in order for that dedication to take place, right? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: So Mike, there's some suggestions from intervenor Coupe that Oceanside is <br /> essentially ignoring their dedication and construction standard. Is that how you took their opening <br /> today? <br /> BAILEY: I'm going to object. This is outside the scope of the orders. There's no language about <br /> LEWIS: Sustain. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Yeah, I think that we're just asking our witness to respond to the assertions <br /> make in opening statement. <br /> LEWIS: If you want to do that I—it is—it's not—it's not relevant to this situation, I mean we—I <br /> think we kind of see where this is going. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Okay. Okay a few questions. <br /> LEWIS: Streamline that pretty <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> Page 18 <br />