My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-10-11 Exh B Transcript 1250 OCEANSIDE LLC (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-10-11 Exh B Transcript 1250 OCEANSIDE LLC (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2025 2:39:10 PM
Creation date
1/15/2025 2:39:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WESLEY-SMITH: I will streamline it. Understood Chair,thank you.Has Oceanside been ignoring <br /> its obligations? <br /> VITOUSEK: No. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: What has Oceanside been trying to do to address this with the County? <br /> VITOUSEK: We've had multiple meetings with multiple County administrations trying to figure <br /> out a plan for how to move forward in the best interest of the community and in the County. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: How far back can you remember these issues being discussed with the County? <br /> VITOUSEK: Discussions with the County have been ongoing the day I came aboard with 1250 <br /> Oceanside, LLC. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Can you tell me some of the options that have been discussed with the County <br /> regarding these roads. <br /> VITOUSEK: Been—suggestions from the County that the roads be maintained private with public <br /> easement. Roads be dedicated to their current condition. Roads be upgraded. There's been a wide <br /> variety of suggestions and discussions coming from different administrations within the County. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: So, you said that some of the discussions are about potentially keeping them <br /> private? <br /> VITOUSEK: Correct. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: And did those discussions though ultimately center on amending ordinance <br /> 96-8? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> BAILEY: Again, objection as to the relevance of the appeals before you. <br /> LEWIS: Sustain. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Okay, last line of question Mike. So big picture, is it Oceanside's intent to <br /> comply with 96-8, whether it's amended or not? <br /> VITOUSEK: Of course, yeah, we're going to do whatever we need to do. Whatever the result is, <br /> we're going to comply with it. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: And does Oceanside want to work with the County? <br /> VITOUSEK: Of course, yeah. Our goal is to work this out, outside of a courtroom. That would <br /> obviously be the best situation to resolve something like this. <br /> WESLEY-SMITH: Does Oceanside want to work it out with intervenor Coupe if they're willing? <br /> VITOUSEK: Oh, absolutely. You know we reached out to Mr. Coupe as a neighbor from the <br /> beginning. I've had multiple meetings with him trying to get on the same page. County offered to <br /> mediate with us, and you know we of course agreed and just their end never came—came along. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.