2025-08-18 3CCV-25-0000025 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Vacating and Remanding to BOA (PL-BOA-2024-000104)

Home

present extrinsic evidence at the declaratory ruling hearing showing County Council's intent regarding Ordinances. • 11) Petitioner requests that Planning state whether Planning has rendered a final decision on Variance. • 12) If Planning determines that it has rendered a final decision on Variance, Petitioner requests that Planning identify the date such decision was rendered. • 13) If Planning determines that it has not rendered a final decision on Variance, Petitioner requests that Planning issue its final decision on Variance. • 14) Petitioner requests that Planning declare whether its approval of a variance application is a "final agency action" that can be appealed. Conversely, if Planning determines that such decisions are not ripe for appeal, Petitioner requests that Planning provide an explanation and the legal basis therefor. • 15) Petitioner requests that Planning identify the appropriate appellate tribunal to review Planning's decisions on variances. • 16) Petitioner requests that Planning identify whether Oceanside was required to "provide roadway stub-outs...to provide connections between the [Hokuli'a Development Project] and its adjacent north and south boundaries. 9