My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-01-05 PL-BOA-2026-000127 Petition
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2026-000127 Leslie Enriquez Rosehill (PD)
>
2026-01-05 PL-BOA-2026-000127 Petition
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 2:37:15 PM
Creation date
1/6/2026 2:36:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
historic, and/or cultural resources, e.g., ala (trails), endagered or threatened species, iwi kupuna <br /> (Native Hawaiian ancestral remains/burials), wahi kupuna, or ko`a (fishing grounds); and <br /> traditional and customary fishing and gathering practices. The Planning Department and its <br /> Director improperly limited the scope of potential impact or effect by failing to evaluate "every <br /> phase" of the proposed Kaimu Cove project"and expected consequences, either primary or <br /> secondary, or the cumulative as well as the short or long-term effect[.]"See SMA Rules § 9-10. <br /> The Department and Director fail to appreciate "every phase," including previous actions <br /> of the Applicant and the sum of expected consequences or long-term effects of the Kaimu Cove <br /> project. The Director clearly erred in ignoring that the Applicant repeatedly conducted <br /> excavation without permits or authorization by the appropriate State and/or County agencies; <br /> destroyed a historic mauka-to-makai coastal trail; damaged at least one documented <br /> archaeological site; and removed ancestral forest resources, including milo and noni groves. <br /> Moreover, Kaimu Cove LLC's permit application, though focused on the SMA Minor Permit <br /> subject of this appeal, includes several references throughout the document to a"subdivision" or <br /> "subdivision development" on the subject property. Even if additional permits are required in the <br /> future to build additional dwellings or structures on the subject property, the development of a <br /> subdivision with multiple dwellings is a foreseeable cumulative impact or long-term effect that <br /> must be considered before any SMA permit is approved or denied. <br /> Information obtained from the Applicant during the SMA assessment process, on which <br /> the Director relied(see Condition no. 12 in Exhibit 1), did not aid in the evaluation of potential <br /> cumulative impact and short or long-term effect to important historic sites and/or cultural <br /> resources. The Applicant erroneously evaluates traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.