My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-01-05 Exhibit 03_SMA Use Permit Application_3rd Resubmittal
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2026-000127 Leslie Enriquez Rosehill (PD)
>
2026-01-05 Exhibit 03_SMA Use Permit Application_3rd Resubmittal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 2:58:49 PM
Creation date
1/6/2026 2:50:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
23. Puna Community Development Plan: <br /> The Puna CDP (PCDP) was developed and adopted by the Hawaii County Council on <br /> August 27, 2008. It became effective on September 10, 2008 as Ordinance No. 08 116. <br /> The PCDP does not define any specific land use pattern for the area in proximity to the <br /> subject property. However, the PCDP established three (3) major themes that guided <br /> the development of the plan: <br /> • Malama 1 Ka'Aina which "establishes how the contextual natural, historic and <br /> cultural features of Puna should be preserved." (emphasis added) <br /> • Growth Management which "addresses how the future pattern of human <br /> settlement and land use should be shaped to respect that context and support <br /> the desired quality of life for Puna's residents." (emphasis added) <br /> • Transportation which "focuses on sustainable approaches to transportation to <br /> support the goals of the two above themes." <br /> Relative to the Malama I Ka'Aina theme, four (4) major elements were identified <br /> and assigned goals, objectives, and actions. These elements and their relationship to <br /> the proposed action follow: <br /> 1. Historic, Cultural, and Scenic Resources <br /> An archaeological inventory survey of the subject property did identify <br /> four (4) sites as significant for the information they contain, but because <br /> sufficient data has been collected from each site, they can be evaluated as "no <br /> longer significant" and that no further archaeological work be required on the <br /> subject property. Nonetheless, should there be inadvertent discoveries during <br /> the construction of this project, work will stop and contacts with the County <br /> Planning Department and State Historic Preservation Division will be made. <br /> Furthermore, the project site is not known as hosting any cultural or scenic <br /> resources. <br /> 2. Native Forests and Geological Features <br /> An assessment of floral and faunal resources and its geology indicates <br /> that the goals and objectives of this element would not be applicable to the <br /> 13IPage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.