My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-01-05 Exhibit 06_Draft Cultural Impact Assessment and Ka Pa'akai Analysis
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2026-000127 Leslie Enriquez Rosehill (PD)
>
2026-01-05 Exhibit 06_Draft Cultural Impact Assessment and Ka Pa'akai Analysis
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 3:41:54 PM
Creation date
1/6/2026 3:39:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• There has already been damage done to the coastal trail and ancestral forest groves <br /> in the project area. <br /> • The project has already been negatively impacted by current owners who have <br /> shown disregard for gathering and religious practices and have proven not to be <br /> culturally respectful or mindful. <br /> • Development of the area facilitates gentrification of the humble and culturally-rich <br /> Native Hawaiian community of Kaimu. <br /> • Gating and blockage of access by current property owners has discouraged <br /> continuity of burial cleansing and gathering linked to ocean access from the project <br /> area. <br /> • Others may not recognize these sites as significant,but they continue to hold great <br /> kuleana and significance to lineal descendants. <br /> • Once the area is destroyed, it's gone and altered to all future generations to have <br /> the same experiences there as their kupuna. <br /> • The kupuna that have passed cannot speak for themselves,it is up to living lineal <br /> descendants to speak for them. <br /> • Burials may be encountered in the project area and may reside within the cliff face <br /> on the eastern side of the parcel. <br /> • The coastline has already shifted significantly with coastal subsidence; coastal <br /> erosion and subsidence are likely in the future. It was described by an <br /> interviewee as "treacherous." <br /> • There has been a lack of communication with lineal descendants regarding this area <br /> from the SMA planners and planning commission. <br /> Recommendations and mitigations suggested by the interviewees include the following: <br /> • The project area should not be developed due to the spiritual,religious,natural,and <br /> cultural sensitivities of the area. <br /> • Do not disturb this coastline, including the coastal forest groves on the project <br /> parcel, as there are few remnants of the ancestral coastline like this in Kalapana <br /> due to the lava histories. <br /> • Clear acknowledgement that this project area is home to a multitude of culturally <br /> significant gathering rights and religious practices. <br /> • Re-zoning/re-establishment of the area to conservation zoning to ensure protection <br /> of this coast. <br /> • Archaeological sites (e.g. historic residential)have already been disturbed by land <br /> clearing and there is the possibility for further destruction if development proceeds. <br /> These sites remain significant to Kalapana`ohana. <br /> • Identify the burial location of Makapo Kaho`okaulana. <br /> • Given the myriad of cultural practices tied to the project area,maintaining cultural <br /> access is of critical importance. Gates should be removed. <br /> • Engagement with the Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation,particularly in regards <br /> to harm caused to the coastal trail. <br /> • Have open and transparent conversations with community members and follow all <br /> recommendations that are shared. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.