2026-05-11 - Minutes DRAFT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

commission is comfortable with us using the reports after the properties are ranked in July, then it would just be a process of compiling them and adding a letter from the Chair. Cmr. Brandt relates that the documents themselves are probably about two or three pages, the photos and maps are what bumps up the page numbers. However, the photos and maps help with context. V. Chr. Britt insisted that maps are a critical part of the report as well as photos. Cmr. Rosam suggests keeping everything in the reports. Mr. Schapiro advised that if the commission wished to, they could look at older annual reports from years past to see how they’ve evolved from just one page with a table of information and little narrative, to nicely bound books. He says that the commission can add whatever information they think is important for the Mayor to have. Chr. Chang reiterates it would be good to revisit the site report write-up and add in a few things for next year. Cmr. Rosam asks if new information comes up regarding the site, requiring a revision of the report, would the commission then have to go through the Sunshine process. DCC Campbell advises that the Sunshine law applies to the work of the permitted interaction group (PInG). The annual report that is sent to the Mayor is separate and apart from the work of the PInG and is a new document. Chr. Chang thanks DCC Campbell Cmr. Rosam adds that DCC Campbell’s explanation helps and that getting the reports in early would free them up to focus on the stewardship grants. Cmr. Brandt asks if it would be wise to include some notes regarding photographing burial sites. She goes on to say that asking the nominating group if it is okay to take photos is the best practice. Chr. Chang does not see the need to form a PInG to work on the improvements that have been mentioned and volunteers to take on that task to provide to the commission for next year. Cmr. Rosam adds a final suggestion to run the report through the nominators thereby giving them a chance to ask that any photos be removed and also making sure all of the information is correct. 3. Review and discussion of the County Council Ad Hoc Committee report regarding the PONC property acquisition process. Possible formation of Permitted Interaction Group(s) for recommendations or action on matters contained in the Ad Hoc Committee report. No Testifiers Chr. Chang suggests the commissioners take a look at the recommended actions to see if there are any that the commission would like to be proactive about. She goes on to say that one of the DRAFT v.1 - Minutes of May 11, 2026 Page 12